Literacy culture in DKI Jakarta elementary schools: An analysis based on school accreditation data

Authors

  • Yulian Dinihari Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
  • Musringudin Musringudin Muhammadiyah University Prof. Dr. HAMKA
  • Endry Boeriswati Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26555/bs.v46i1.1762

Keywords:

Education Quality, Elementary School, Language Instruction, Literacy Culture , Partied of Indonesian

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of literacy culture and learning quality in public elementary schools across DKI Jakarta. In this study, literacy culture is defined as the institutional integration of reading and writing practices, supportive learning environments, aligned assessment, and school facilities that sustain literacy-oriented instruction. Using data from 195 accredited schools, the research analyzes seven key indicators: higher-order thinking skills, student assessment, remedial and enrichment programs, enjoyable learning facilities, literacy integration, classroom environment, and infrastructure optimization. Accreditation documents were used not as direct measures of students’ literacy outcomes, but as institutional indicators reflecting the extent to which schools embed literacy-supporting practices in teaching and school management. The results show that most schools have implemented structured literacy programs and performance-based assessments, with 97.4% achieving high literacy integration. However, disparities remain in interactive learning environments and differentiated instruction, as only 46.2% met the criteria for enjoyable facilities and 69.7% for remedial and enrichment efforts. Qualitative analysis using NVivo identified dominant themes such as learning, literacy, and comfort, indicating school priorities. The study highlights the need for holistic improvement strategies, including technology integration, teacher training, and infrastructure support, to ensure sustainable literacy development and equitable access to quality education in urban settings. These findings show that high institutional literacy integration does not automatically indicate equal quality across all supporting dimensions, especially in enjoyable learning facilities and remedial-enrichment practices.

References

Achmad, W. K. S., Rachman, S. A., Aras, L., & Amran, M. (2024). Differentiated instruction in reading in elementary schools: A systematic review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 13(3), 1997–2005. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.821227

Ardenlid, F., Lundqvist, J., & Sund, L. (2025). A scoping review and thematic analysis of differentiated instruction practices: How teachers foster inclusive classrooms for all students, including gifted students. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 7, 100439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100439

Berkowitz, R. (2021). School climate and the socioeconomic literacy achievement gap: Multilevel analysis of compensation, mediation, and moderation models. Children and Youth Services Review, 130, 106238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106238

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Bluteau, J., Aubenas, S., & Dufour, F. (2022). Influence of flexible classroom seating on the wellbeing and mental health of upper elementary school students: A gender analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 821227. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.821227

Coker, D. (2006). Impact of first-grade factors on the growth and outcomes of urban schoolchildren’s primary-grade writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 471. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.471

Cole, K., Schroeder, K., Bataineh, M., & Al-Bataineh, A. (2021). Flexible seating impact on classroom environment. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 20(2), 62-74.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Research, 4.

Dahl-Leonard, K., Hall, C., Cho, E., Capin, P., Roberts, G. J., Kehoe, K. F., Haring, C., Peacott, D., & Demchak, A. (2025). Examining the effects of family-implemented literacy interventions for school-aged children: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 37, 10. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v10i4.32938

Dinihari, Y., Suseno, M., & Setiadi, S. (2021). Evaluasi hasil akreditasi sekolah dasar dan madrasah ibtidaiyah DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Holistika, 5(2), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.24853/holistika.5.2.85-95

Dinihari, Y., Rafli, Z., & Boeriswati, E. (2025). Inovasi bahan ajar literasi: Pendekatan gamifikasi dan pedagogi modern. EDUPEDIA Publisher.

Dong, Y., Wu, X., Dong, W., & Tang, Y. (2020). The effects of home literacy environment on children’s reading comprehension development: A meta-analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 20(2), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104242

Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203428405

Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.). In Handbook of reading research, 3. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1774612

Hall, G. J., Parker, D. C., Nelson, P. M., & Putzeys, S. N. (2024). Family involvement in elementary reading intervention: Compensatory relations to dosage and tutor-level heterogeneity. Remedial and Special Education, 45(5), 279-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325231217313

Helmanto, F., Fauziyah, F. F., Purwanto, A., Dinihari, Y., Pratama, E. Y., Yuskar, B., Nugrahawan, A. R., Almanar, M. A., Basri, L. O. M. I. H., Atqia, W., Retnomu, A. B., & Muliastuti, L. (2024). Literasi dalam keluarga, sekolah, perguruan tinggi, dan masyarakat. Mitra Palupi. https://letsread.mitrapalupi.com/index.php/mp/catalog/book/14

Hu, L. (2024). Utilization of differentiated instruction in K-12 classrooms: A systematic literature review (2000–2022). Asia Pacific Education Review, 25, 507–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09931-y

Hutagalung, B., & Purbani, W. (2021). The ability of digital literacy for elementary school teachers. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 10(4), 710-721. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v10i4.32938

Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., & Zourmpakis, A. I. (2021). Gamification in science education: A systematic review of the literature. Education Sciences, 11(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010022

Kemdikbudristek. (2022). Rapor pendidikan Indonesia. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Riset dan Teknologi.

Kirsten, N., Lindvall, J., Ryve, A., & Gustafsson, J. E. (2023). How effective is the professional development in which teachers typically participate? Quasi-experimental analyses of effects on student achievement based on TIMSS 2003–2019. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104242

Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12337

Kucer, S. B. (2014). Dimensions of literacy: A conceptual base for teaching reading and writing in school settings (Fourth edition). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203428405

Lee, S., Kuo, L. J., Xu, Z., & Hu, X. (2022). The effects of technology-integrated classroom instruction on K-12 English language learners’ literacy development: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(5–6), 1106-1137. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1774612

Marinelli, A. H., Berlinski, S., Busso, M., & Martínez Correa, J. (2022). Improving early literacy through teacher professional development: Experimental evidence from Colombia. IDB Working Paper No. 1388. Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.471

Marmoah, S., Poerwanti, J. I. S., & Suharno, J. (2022). Literacy culture management of elementary school in Indonesia. Heliyon, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09315

Martins, J., Cunha, J., Lopes, S., Moreira, T., & Rosário, P. (2022). School engagement in elementary school: A systematic review of 35 years of research. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 793–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09642-5

Milner, R. H. (2018). Confronting inequity/assessment for equity. Educational Leadership, 75(5).

Noble, C., Sala, G., Peter, M., Lingwood, J., Rowland, C. F., Gobet, F., & Pine, J. M. (2019). The impact of shared book reading on children’s language skills: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100290. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v16i3.20493

Ntsobi, M. P., & Costa, K. (2022). Change management as a requirement for introducing ICT in curriculum delivery–the gauteng experience. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 11. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.11.2022.e559

OECD. (2019). How does PISA define and measure reading literacy? In PISA in Focus, 101.

Parera, S. V., Iriani, A., & Waruwu, M. (2024). Evaluasi gerakan literasi sekolah di sekolah dasar dengan menggunakan model evaluasi CIPPO. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 11(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2024.v11.i1.p82-92

Perkins, J. H., & Cooter, K. (2013). An investigation of the efficacy of one urban literacy academy: Enhancing teacher capacity through professional development. Reading Horizons, 52(2), 6.

Philipsen, B., Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., Vanslambrouck, S., & Zhu, C. (2019). Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: A systematic meta-aggregative review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1145-1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09645-8

Rios, J. A., Ihlenfeldt, S. D., & Chavez, C. (2020). Are accommodations for English learners on state accountability assessments evidence-based? A multistudy systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 39(4), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12337

Rizqiyah, N., Rendiyawati, R., & Agustin, S. (2022). Implementasi kebijakan gerakan literasi di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi dan Humaniora, 13(2), 797-806. https://doi.org/10.26418/j-psh.v13i2.54593

Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, D. V. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400203

Simon, M. A. (2020). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114-145. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.26.2.0114

Surahman, E., Santaria, R., & Setiawan, E. I. (2020). Tantangan pembelajaran daring di Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Education Management, 5(2), 89-98.

Suratmi, S., & Sopandi, W. (2022). Knowledge, skills, and attitudes of teachers in training critical thinking of elementary school students. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 16(3), 291-298. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v16i3.20493

Tomlinson, C. A., & Moon, T. R. (2013). Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Ulya, C., Putri, U. R., Setyawan, B. W., Samsiyah, N., Septiana, H., & Joyotu, T. S. (2023). A bibliometric analysis on “edu-technopreneurship” topic and chance on its development in language, literature, and literacy fields. BAHASTRA, 43(2), 183-197. https://doi.org/10.26555/bs.v43i2.502

Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 315–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1

Wangid, M. N., Mustadi, A., & Mokshien, S. E. B. (2020). The exploration of teachers’ efficacy in teaching: Comparative study in Indonesia and Malaysia. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(2), 257-268. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i2.30012

Wirth, A., Ehmig, S. C., & Niklas, F. (2022). The role of the home literacy environment for children’s linguistic and socioemotional competencies development in the early years. Social Development, 31(2), 372-387. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12550

Additional Files

Published

2026-04-13