Peer tutoring in EFL higher education: Exploring students’ learning through the lens of Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development

Authors

  • Eko Purwanti Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Ghani Rifqi Adli Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Endro Dwi Hatmanto Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Noor Qomaria Agustina Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/tefl.v5i1.2106

Keywords:

Peer tutoring, EFL learning , Sociocultural theory, Scaffolding, Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD)

Abstract

English plays a crucial role in Indonesian higher education; however, traditional classroom practices often limit opportunities for personalized learning and active student engagement. This study examines peer tutoring as an alternative approach, drawing on Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), which conceptualizes learning as the progression from what learners can do independently to what they can achieve with guidance from More Knowledgeable Others (MKO). Employing a qualitative design, this research explores how peer tutoring supports English language learning in an English Language Education Department at a private university in Yogyakarta. Two main themes emerged from the findings. First, peer tutoring fosters both cognitive and socio-affective development, as students demonstrate enhanced critical thinking, increased motivation, greater confidence, and stronger collaborative relationships within a supportive learning environment. Second, peer tutoring operationalizes ZPD through a structured scaffolding process, beginning with diagnosing learners’ current abilities (Zone of Current Development) and advancing their competence toward independent performance (Zone of Actual Development) through guided interaction, explanation, modelling, and feedback. This study contributes to the growing body of research on student-centered learning by demonstrating how peer tutoring functions as an effective pedagogical strategy that integrates sociocultural theory into practical classroom contexts, particularly in EFL higher education settings.

References

Aderibigbe, S. (2021). Can online discussions facilitate deep learning for students in General Education? Heliyon, 7(3), e06414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06414

Alghamdy, R. Z. (2023). English teachers’ practice of classroom discourse in light of Zone of Proximal Development theory and scaffolding techniques. Journal of Language Teaching and Research,15(1). https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1501.06

Ali, N., Anwer, M., & Abbas, J. (2015). Impact of Peer Tutoring on Learning of Students. Journal for Studies in Management and Planning, 1(2), 61–66.

Alwi, S. K. K., Rauf, D. M. Bin, & Soomro, S. (2020). Effects of Cross and Same Age Peer Tutoring on Effects of Cross and Same Age Peer Tutoring on Reading Attitudes of. January 2016.

Bakker, A., Smit, J., & Wegerif, R. (2015). Scaffolding and dialogic teaching in mathematics education: introduction and review. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 47(7), 1047–1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0738-8

Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00282-x

Chen, C., & Liu, C.-C. (2011). A case study of peer tutoring program in higher education. Research in Higher Education Journal, 11, 1–10.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.

Colver, M., & Fry, T. (2016). Evidence to support peer tutoring programs at the undergraduate level. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 46(1), 16–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2015.1075446

Comfort, P., & James McMahon, J. (2014). The effect of peer tutoring on academic achievement. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 6(1), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-06-2012-0017

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Dias JM, Al Kaabi FSBS, Al Hooti ST, Hammadi NO, Karim R, AlYateem N, Reefat Ahmed F, Sara Abraham M, Seshan V, Arsyad Sub M, Dias AR, Mottershead R. Exploring peer tutoring experiences in improving nursing students' academic success and performance: A qualitative study among Emirati undergraduate nursing students. F1000Res. 2026 Feb 17;14:1416. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.172023.2 PMID: 41509105; PMCID: PMC12775669.

Djidu, H., Mashuri, S., Nasruddin, N., Sejati, A. E., Rasmuin, R., Ugi, L. E., & Arua, A. La. (2021). Online learning in the post-Covid-19 pandemic era: Is our higher education ready for it? Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 5(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v5i2.479

Eun, B. (2019). The zone of proximal development as an overarching concept: A framework for synthesizing Vygotsky’s theories. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(1), 18–30.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1421941

Evans, O. G. (2019). Vygotsky’s Zone Of Proximal Development And Scaffolding. Simply Psychology.

Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2014). Role of expectations and explanations in learning by teaching.

Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.01.001

Fitriani, W. (2016). Implementation of Peer Tutoring To Improve Students’s Learning Outcome. Proceeding IAIN Batusangkar, 415–426.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Haider, M., & Yasmin, A. (2015). Significance of scaffolding and peer tutoring in the light of Vygotsky’s theory of zone of proximal development. International journal of languages, Literature and Linguistics, 1(3), 170–173. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlll.2015.1.3.33

Hamid, K. S. (2025). Comparing task-based and project-based learning on student engagement.

Journal of Islamic Education and Educational Development. https://doi.org/10.21580/jieed.v5i2.23817

Hanifansyah, N., Solehudin, M., & Izzuddin, I. F. (2024). Peer tutoring as a collaborative approach in enhancing language learning. Lahjatuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.38073/lahjatuna.v4i1.2181

Herinek, D., et al. (2025). Peer tutor preparation and its impact on tutor–tutee congruence.

Nurse Education Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2025.105979

Kusmaryono, I. (2021). The role of the zone of proximal development and zone of potential construction in students’ mathematical learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 1–10.

Lachner, A., Backfisch, I., & Stürmer, K. (2021). A test of the cognitive elaboration hypothesis for learning by teaching. Learning and Instruction, 72, 101442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101442

Li, Z., Hampson, P., Thurston, A., & O’Keeffe, J. (2025). The outcome of peer tutoring for second language (L2) writing: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 8, 100422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100422

Maxamatismoyilovna, S. R. (2020). Enhancing students motivation in Learning English Language for non-philology students. International Journal on Integrated Education, 3(11), 41–44. https://doi.org/10.31149/ijie.v3i11.820

Miravet, L. M., Ciges, A. S., & García, O. M. (2014). An experience of reciprocal peer tutoring at the university. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2809–2812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.661

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422

Parker, R., Tariq, A. H., & Smith, A. J. (2023). Exploring The Effectiveness of Peer Tutoring In English Language Learning Among Young Learners. 1(2), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.62583/rseltl.v1i2.13

Purwanti, E., Hatmanto, E. D., & Yogyakarta, U. M. (2019). Understanding EFL Teachers’ Beliefs about Lesson Study and Their Knowledge Development Viewed from Social Cultural Theory of Vygotsky. English Language Teaching Educational Journal (ELTEJ), 2(2), 50–61.

Ratanarajah, J., Razak, F. A., & Zamzuri, Z. H. (2020). Peer tutor network and academic performance: A UKM pilot study. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2266(October). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0018158

Redmond, P., Heffernan, A., Abawi, L., Brown, A., & Henderson, R. (2021).

An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning Journal, 25(1), 183–204.

Silalahi, R. M. (2025). Improving EFL students’ writing through peer tutoring.

Polyglot: Jurnal Ilmiah, 21(2), 72–105.

Siregar, T. (2025). Application of the Peer Tutoring Method in Enhancing Students’ Mathematical Understanding and Learning Motivation. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202510.1627.v1

Slavin, R. E. (2015). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

Smagorinsky, P. (2018). Deconflating the ZPD and instructional scaffolding: Retranslating and reconceiving the zone of proximal development as the zone of next development. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 16, 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.10.009

Sonawane, S., & Waldia, N. (2022). Peer facilitated learning.

Stigmar, M. (2016). Peer-to-peer Teaching in Higher Education: A Critical Literature Review. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2016.1178963

Syafrizal, S., & Tosi Rut, S. (2022). Journal of Linguistics, Literacy, and Pedagogy. 1(1), 35–39.

Tanjung, F. Z. (2018). Language Learning Strategies in English As a Foreign Language Classroom in Indonesian Higher Education Context. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 21(Suppl), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v21isuppl.966

Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2020). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 29–57.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Watcharapunyawong, S. (2018). The Effects of Online Peer Tutoring on First-Year Undergraduate Students’ English Grammar Achievement. IJIE (Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education), 2(2), 69. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijie.v2i2.24382

Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Socio-cultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605895

Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.

Wu, L., & Bakar, K. A. (2025). Language scaffolding strategies based on Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development: A cross-cultural comparison. Frontiers in Language Sciences, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i6.9624

Zamzami, Z., & Keumala, C. M. (2018). Blended Learning Method Within Indonesian Higher Education Institutions. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 6(2), 69–77.

Zulkifli, N. N., Abd Halim, N. D., Yahaya, N., & Van Der Meijden, H. (2020). Patterns of Critical Thinking Processing in Online Reciprocal Peer Tutoring through Facebook Discussion. IEEE Access, 8, 24269–24283. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968960

Downloads

Published

2026-05-08

How to Cite

Purwanti, E., Adli, G. R., Dwi Hatmanto, E., & Agustina, N. Q. (2026). Peer tutoring in EFL higher education: Exploring students’ learning through the lens of Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development. Teaching English As a Foreign Language Journal, 5(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.12928/tefl.v5i1.2106

Issue

Section

Articles