Liberate Hong Kong? Language, agency, and imagining political futures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/tefl.v4i2.1705Keywords:
Critical discourse analysis, Critical English for Academic Purposes, Language and identity, Hong Kong, BN(O)Abstract
The slogan “Liberate Hong Kong, revolution of our times” (光復香港，時代革命) emerged during the 2019 protests as a symbol of solidarity and political aspiration among Hongkongers. Its prominence and subsequent criminalization highlight its role in debates over identity, governance, and self-determination. This article examines the discursive function of the slogan and its pedagogical implications within Critical English for Academic Purposes (CEAP), showing how language can challenge state narratives while fostering civic engagement. Using documentary analysis, the study combines Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) with CEAP to trace the slogan’s role as a discursive act, drawing on political addresses, policy responses, and exiled initiatives. Findings indicate that the slogan operates as a counter-discourse to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) reunification narrative. It constructs political agency and solidarity among participants. It also shapes imaginaries of political transformation, reflected in diasporic activism and proposals for alternative governance. By integrating CDA and CEAP, the study highlights the slogan’s dual political and pedagogical significance, demonstrating how language learning can intersect with civic imagination to promote critical engagement with governance, agency, and self-determination. Overall, the analysis underscores the interdisciplinary reach of applied linguistics and the capacity of discourse to enact social critique and envision political possibilities.
References
Benesch, S. (1996). Needs analysis and curriculum development in EAP: An example of a critical approach. TESOL Quarterly, 30(4), 723-738. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587931
Bowman, S. (2020, May 28). Let’s build Hong Kong 2.0 here in the UK. CAPX. https://capx.co/lets-build-hong-kong-2-0-here-in-the-uk/
Ching, F. (2018). Nationality vs ethnic identity. Asian Education and Development Studies, 7(2), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-09-2017-0095
Chun, C. W. (2015). Power and meaning making in an EAP classroom (1st ed.). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092956
Ebner, N., & Peck, J. (2022). FANTASY ISLAND: Paul Romer and the multiplication of Hong Kong. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 46(1), 26-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13060
Fenton-Smith, B. (2014). The place of Benesch's critical English for academic purposes in the current practice of academic language and learning. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 8(3). https://search.informit.org/documentSummary;res=AEIPT;dn=203870
Fleming, D., & Morgan, B. (2011). Discordant anthems: ESL and critical citizenship education. Citizenship Education Research Network (CERN) Collection, 30-42.
Flowerdew, J. (1997). The discourse of colonial withdrawal: A case study in the creation of mythic discourse. Discourse & Society, 8(4), 453-477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008004002
Flowerdew, J. (2004a). The discursive construction of a world-class city. Discourse & Society, 15(5), 579-605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504045033
Flowerdew, J. (2004b). Identity politics and Hong Kong’s return to Chinese sovereignty: Analysing the discourse of Hong Kong’s first chief executive. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(9), 1551-1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.002
Flowerdew, J. (2011). Critical discourse analysis in historiography: The case of Hong Kong's evolving political identity (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230336841
Flowerdew, J. (2016). A historiographical approach to Hong Kong Occupy. Journal of Language and Politics, 15(5), 529-548. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.5.02flo
Flowerdew, J. (2017). Understanding the Hong Kong umbrella movement. Discourse & Society, 28(5), 453-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517710991
Flowerdew, J., & Leong, S. (2007). Metaphors in the discursive construction of patriotism: The case of Hong Kong's constitutional reform debate. Discourse & Society, 18(3), 273-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507075476
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office. [@FCDOGovUK]. (2020, July 2). It constitutes a clear violation of the autonomy of Hong Kong, a direct threat to the freedoms of its people [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/fcdogovuk/status/1278363867249328129
Free Cities Foundation. (2024, December 11). Ivan Ko: The Journey to 21st Century City in Thames Freeport. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WD9eadOYHq0
Görömbölyi, D. (2022). The on-line boom of Tibetan diplomacy. New Zealand International Review, 47(2), 15-18. http://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.331214029522081
GOV.UK. (n.d.). British National (Overseas) visa. https://www.gov.uk/british-national-overseas-bno-visa
GOV.UK. (2021, January 29). Hong Kong BN(O) visa: UK government to honour historic commitment. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/hong-kong-bno-visa-uk-government-to-honour-historic-commitment
Grant, A. (2018). Doing excellent social research with documents: Practical examples and guidance for qualitative researchers (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315177274
Hannan, D. (2020, June 6). Let’s build a self-governing Hong Kong in Britain, in defiance of big bully China. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06/06/build-self-governing-hong-kong-britain-defiance-big-bully-china/
Hongkongers in Britain (n.d.). HKB Charter. https://hongkongers.org.uk/hkb-charter/
HK Parliament. (n.d.). Homepage. https://hkparliament.org/
Ho, W. C. (2023). The settling experience of Hongkongers in London. China Review, 23(3), 245-272. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48740213
Hong Kong protests: UK should not interfere, says Chinese ambassador. (2019, August 16). BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-49356495
Jackson, J. (2002). In search of a home: Identities in transition in postcolonial Hong Kong. English Today, 18(2), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078402002067
Kichanova, V. (2025). Beyond Freeports: Revitalising Britain with self-governing cities [Working paper]. Institute of Economic Affairs. https://iea.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/IEA_Kichanova-Beyond-Freeports_V2_Digital.pdf
Leung, J. H. C. (2024). Sedition or Mere Dissent? Linguistic Analysis of a Political Slogan. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law = Revue Internationale De Sémiotique Juridique, 37(2), 647–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10042-x
Lin, Y., Chen, M., & Flowerdew, J. (2022). 'Same, same but different': Representations of Chinese mainland and Hong Kong people in the press in post-1997 Hong Kong. Critical Discourse Studies, 19(4), 364-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2021.1905015
Macaes, B. (2020, June 4). Britain could be a Eurasian capital. The Spectator. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/britain-could-be-a-eurasian-capital/
McConnell, F. (2009). De facto, displaced, tacit: The sovereign articulations of the Tibetan Government-in-Exile. Political Geography, 28(6), 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.04.001
McConnell, F. (2016). Rehearsing the state: The political practices of the Tibetan Government-in-Exile (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118661192
Morgan, B. (2009). Fostering transformative practitioners for critical EAP: Possibilities and challenges. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(2), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.09.001
Morgan, B., & Ahmed, A. (2023). Teaching the nation(s): A Duoethnography on affect and citizenship in a content‐based EAP program. TESOL Quarterly, 57(3), 859–889. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3213
Mut Bosque, M. (2020). The sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit era. Island Studies Journal, 15(1), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.114
Ng, T. W. C. (2020). Recontextualisation of Beijing’s voice: A critical discourse analysis of hegemony and resistance in Hong Kong political discourse. Discourse & Society, 31(5), 540-561. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520914683
Patten finds a fan in the Dalai Lama. (1996, June 10). SCMP. https://www.scmp.com/article/163034/patten-finds-fan-dalai-lama
Phillips, T. & Cheung, E. (2016, August 26). 'Liberate Hong Kong': pre-election calls for independence from China grow. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/aug/26/liberate-hong-kong-calls-independence-china-elections-loom
Statham, S. (2022). Critical discourse analysis: A practical introduction to power in language. Routledge.
Stola, D. (2012). The Polish government-in-exile: National unity and weakness. Holocaust Studies, 18(2-3), 95-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/17504902.2012.11087314
Tang, A. (2022). The parasites of language. Language and Dialogue, 12(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00110.tan
Tang, W. (2014). (Re) imaginings of Hong Kong: Voices from the Hong Kong diaspora and their children. Journal of Chinese Overseas, 10(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1163/17932548-12341275
Ullah, A. K. M. A., & Azizuddin, M. (2022). Colonial hangover and ‘Invited’ migration: Hong Kongers to the UK. International Studies (New Delhi), 59(2), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208817221101222
Wang, J. (2017). Discursive strategies and identity construction: A study based on the PAs of the HK governments pre- and post-transition. Jinan University Press.
Wong, K. H. (2024). From mass protests to national security: A critical analysis of Carrie Lam’s political responses during the 2019 Hong Kong protests. Journal of Postcolonial Linguistics, 10, 1-25. https://iacpl.net/jopol/issues/journal-of-postcolonial-linguistics-10-2024/from-mass-protests-to-national-security/
Wong, K. H. (2025a). A Critical EAP perspective on “Glory to Hong Kong”: Language, identity, and resistance. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 8(2), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v8i2.14037
Wong, K. H. (2025b). Opinion – Why Britain should back a Hong Kong Government-in-Exile. e-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2025/06/18/opinion-why-britain-should-back-a-hong-kong-government-in-exile/
Wong, S. H., Ho, K., Clarke, H. D., & Chan, K. C. (2023). Does loyalty discourage exit? evidence from post-2020 Hong Kong. Journal of Asian and African Studies (Leiden), 58(1), 101-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096221124935
Xinhua. (2014, August 31). Full text of NPC decision on universal suffrage for HK Chief Executive selection. http://www.china.org.cn/china/2014-08/31/content_33390388.htm
Yu, A. (2022). Hong Kong, CANZUK, and Commonwealth: The United Kingdom's role in defending freedom and the global order under 'Global Britain'. Round Table (London), 111(4), 516-521. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2022.2105532
Yu, A. (2023). British values, Hong Kong voices: Tracing Hong Kong's Britishness and its influences on British immigration policies. African and Asian Studies, 22(4), 418-451. https://doi.org/10.1163/15692108-12341616
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in TEFL Journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the TEFL Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in TEFL Journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in TEFL Journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
