Institutional Design Commission Eradication Corruption Post Change Constitution Number 19 of 2019 Concerning Commission Eradication Corruption

Abstract

This research aims to determine the implications of changes to Law Number 19 of 2019 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) on the independence of the Corruption Eradication Committee and to find out the design for maximizing the KPK institution after Law Number 19 of 2019 Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Eradication Commission Corruption Crime. This research uses a normative juridical method, namely an approach that involves conducting a literature study to obtain secondary data. This research discusses the implications for the independence of the Corruption Eradication Commission following the amendment to Law No. 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission and proposes a future institutional design for the Corruption Eradication Commission. Data sources were obtained from primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The data was then analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods. The results of this research show that the implication of changes to the Corruption Eradication Commission Law is that the KPK has shifted to an executive institution, meaning that the Corruption Eradication Committee is no longer an independent state institution, the performance of the Supervisory Board which does not strictly provide ethical sanctions is a consideration. not independent and represents a loss of independence for KPK employees. Apart from that, optimal design of the KPK institution is also important for countries with many corruption cases, so that the KPK becomes an independent institution or in other words free from the influence of any power, so that the KPK is included in the constitution. organs so that they do not change easily, initiating the formation of regional offices so that corruption cases can be easily handled without high mobility, KPK investigators are recruited by the KPK itself, and the composition of the Supervisory Board should be a combination of internal and external employees proposed by the Government or DPR in a transparent manner.