Navigating stress, anxiety, and mentorship: Challenges for students working on dissertations in the pandemic era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/jprotect.v2i1.856Keywords:
Challenge, Anxiety and stress experience, Improvement strategy, Online supervisionAbstract
PhD students often encounter significant challenges, stress, and anxiety throughout their academic journey, particularly in their final year. This study explores the common difficulties faced by PhD students conducting thesis research at Chinese universities, focusing on their experiences with online supervision during the COVID-19 pandemic. A survey was conducted with ten full-time PhD students from selected Chinese universities, utilizing a combination of scaled, closed, and open-ended questions. The results indicate that students faced considerable challenges during online supervision, mainly due to inadequate funding and irregular, delayed supervisor feedback. Significant sources of stress and anxiety included thesis writing, supervisor relationships, and socioeconomic issues. However, adequate supervision, timely feedback, and purposeful guidance were found to mitigate these challenges. The study concludes that online supervision during the pandemic has intensified the difficulties faced by PhD students, negatively impacting the quality of their research and completion rates. To improve the supervision process, students recommended enhancing communication, increasing supervisor accessibility, and providing prompt feedback to support timely dissertation completion.
References
Abdulai, R. T., & Owusu-Ansah, A. (2014). Essential ingredients of a good research proposal for undergraduate and postgraduate students in the social sciences. SAGE Open, 4(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014548178
Asif, S., Mudassar, A., Shahzad, T. Z., Raouf, M., & Pervaiz, T. (2020). Frequency of depression, anxiety, and stress among university students. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(5), 971–976. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.5.1873
Bacwayo, K. E., Nampala, P., & Oteyo, I. N. (2017). Challenges and Opportunities Associated with Supervising Graduate Students Enrolled in African Universities. International Journal of Education and Practice, 5(3), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61/2017.5.3/61.3.29.39
Bazrafkan, L., Shokrpour, N., Yousefi, A., & Yamani, N. (2016). Management of stress and anxiety among Ph.D. students during thesis writing: A qualitative study. Health Care Manager, 35(3), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1097/HCM.0000000000000120
Bolt, B., & Kett, G. (2010). The trouble with CARE: Creative arts and research ethics. In M. Kiley (Ed.), Quality In Postgraduate Research Conference: Educating Researchers for the 21st Century (pp. 119–128). The Centre for Educational Development and Academic Methods, The Australian National University.
Corral, D., Carpenter, S. K., & Clingan-Siverly, S. (2021). The effects of immediate versus delayed feedback on complex concept learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(4), 786–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820977739
Djamba, Y. K. (2002). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Teaching Sociology, 30(3), 380. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211488
Ergin, E., & Şahan, S. (2021). Determination of the problems experienced by postgraduate nursing students at the thesis stage during the pandemic period. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, 1, 852–865. https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.905240
Ezebilo, E. E. (2012). Challenges in Postgraduate Studies: Assessments by doctoral students in a Swedish University. Higher Education Studies, 2(4), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v2n4p49
Garcia, M. E., Malott, R. W., & Brethower, D. (1988). A system of thesis and dissertation supervision: Helping Graduate students succeed. The Teaching of Psychology, 15(4), 186–191. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1504_2
Gbettor, E. M. A., Mensah, C., & Avorgah, S. M. K. (2015). Challenges of writing dissertations: Perceptual differences between students and supervisors in a ghanaian polytechnic. International Journal of Education and Practice, 3(4), 182–198. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61/2015.3.4/61.4.182.198
Heath, T. (2002). A quantitative analysis of Ph.D. students’ views of supervision. Higher Education Research and Development, 21(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360220124648
Ikram-Uniten, J., & Anwar, R. (2013). Challenges being experienced by undergraduate students in conducting research in open and distance learning. International Journal of Asian Social Science Journal, 3(9), 1906–1912.
Jordan, R. K., Shah, S. S., Desai, H., Tripi, J., Mitchell, A., & Worth, R. G. (2020). Variation of stress levels, burnout, and resilience throughout the academic year in first-year medical students. Plos one, 15(10), e0240667. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240667
Kangai, C., & Mapolisa, T. (2012). Factors that affect student’s progress and the completion rate in the research project: A study of research students and their supervisors at the Zimbabwe Open University. International Journal of New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 3(1), 83–94.
Mat Nawi, F. A., Abdul Malek A.Tambi, Muhammad Faizal Samat, & Wan Masnieza Wan Mustapha. (2020). a Review on the internal consistency of a scale: The empirical example of the influence of human capital investment on malcom baldridge quality principles in Tvet Institutions. Asian People Journal (APJ), 3(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2020.3.1.121
McAlpine, L., & McKinnon, M. (2013). Supervision - the most variable of variables: Student perspectives. Studies in Continuing Education, 35(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2012.746227
Mohajan, H. K. (2017). Two criteria for good measurements in research: Validity and reliability. Annals of Spiru Haret University. Economic Series, 17(4), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.26458/1746
Momeni, M., Samimi, B., Afshari, M. A., Maleki, M. H., & Mohammadi, J. (2011). Selection process of supervisor for doctoral dissertation using Analytical Network Process (ANP): An Iranian study. Journal of Management and Strategy, 2(2), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.5430/jms.v2n2p63
Muraraneza, C., Mtshali, N., & Bvumbwe, T. (2020). Challenges in postgraduate research supervision in nursing education: Integrative review. Nurse Education Today, 89, 104376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104376
Mutula, S. M. (2011). Challenges of postgraduate research: A case of developing countries. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 77(2), 184–190. https://doi.org/10.7553/77-2-60
Niemi, P. M., & Vainiomäki, P. T. (2006). Medical students’ distress - Quality, continuity, and gender differences during a six-year medical program. Medical Teacher, 28(2), 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590600607088
Rauf, F. A. (2016). Challenges of thesis work: towards minimizing the non-completion rate in the postgraduate degree program. Concern, 8(7), 113-124.
Rohmatillah. (2014). A study on students’ difficulties in learning vocabulary. Jurnal Raden Intan Lampung, 3(1), 69–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v6i1.520
Shazia, N., & Khan, M. S. (2015). The Impact of Time Management on the Students ’ Academic Achievements. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 11, 66-71.
Stappenbelt, B., & Basu, A. (2019). Student-supervisor-university expectation alignment in the undergraduate engineering thesis. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.482
Warfa, A. R. M. (2016). Mixed-methods design in biology education research: Approach and uses. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4), rm5. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0022
Zhao, C. M., Golde, C. M., & McCormick, A. C. (2007). More than a signature: How advisor choice and advisor behaviour affect doctoral student satisfaction. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(3), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770701424983.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Professional Teacher Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in journal of Professional Teacher Education agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
