Analysis of reading comprehension skills among elementary school students: What should professional teachers do?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/jprotect.v4i1.2198Keywords:
Elementary school students, Learning strategies, Reading comprehension, Reading literacy, Reading skillsAbstract
Reading comprehension is a fundamental skill for academic success in elementary school, yet many students continue to struggle to understand text content, particularly at the fourth-grade level. While prior studies have examined reading comprehension broadly across elementary grades, few have combined test, observation, and interview data to build a context-specific profile of a single fourth-grade cohort. This study addresses that gap by analyzing the reading comprehension skills of fourth-grade students at SDN 106 Palembang, a public elementary school in Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia, and identifying the factors associated with their performance. Using a qualitative descriptive design supported by a reading comprehension test, data were collected from 30 fourth-grade students through tests, classroom observations, and teacher interviews. The findings show that students' reading comprehension remains at a moderate-to-low level: many students had difficulty identifying main ideas, summarizing or drawing conclusions from text, and interpreting implied meaning, and a majority showed low engagement during reading activities. These difficulties appear to be associated with internal factors (limited reading interest, motivation, and vocabulary) and external factors (limited variety in teaching methods and learning media). The study contributes context-specific, triangulated evidence on fourth-grade reading comprehension and highlights the need for elementary teachers to implement more interactive, varied, and media-supported reading instruction to strengthen students’ comprehension skills and engagement.
References
Alqahtani, S. S. (2026). A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on technology-based interventions for elementary students with reading difficulties. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 174, 105318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2026.105318
Butcher, K. R. (2024). Promoting understanding in digital contexts: Using the construction-integration model as a framework for educational technology design and assessment technology design and assessment. Discourse Processes, 61(6–7), 347–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2024.2357983
Capin, P., Gillam, S. L., Fall, A. M., Roberts, G., Dille, J. T., & Gillam, R. B. (2022). Understanding the nature and severity of reading difficulties among students with language and reading comprehension difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 72(2), 249-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-022-00255-3
Capin, P., Cho, E., Miciak, J., Roberts, G., & Vaughn, S. (2021). Examining the reading and cognitive profiles of students with significant reading comprehension difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 44(3), 183-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948721989973
Chang-Arana, Á. M., Piispanen, M., Himberg, T., Surma-Aho, A., Alho, J., Sams, M., & Hölttä-Otto, K. (2020). Empathic accuracy in design: Exploring design outcomes through empathic performance and physiology. Design Science, 6, e16. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2020.14
Coşkun, B., & Göktaş, S. A. (2026). The role of home and classroom factors in shaping reading achievement: A multilevel study based on PIRLS 2021 Türkiye data. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 89, 101598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101598
Duke, N. K., Ward, A. E., & Pearson, P. D. (2021). The science of reading comprehension instruction. The Reading Teacher, 74(6), 663-672. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1993
Fan, E., Bower, M., & Siemon, J. (2026). From heartbeats to actions: Multimodal learning analytics of cognitive and behavior engagement in real classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 103, 102325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2026.102325
Gernsbacher, M. A. (2024). Construction–integration and the structure building framework: Twin siblings born of different parents. Discourse Processes, 61(6-7), 304-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2024.2360294
Hackemann, T., Heine, L., & Höttecke, D. (2022). Challenging to read, easy to comprehend? Effects of linguistic demands on secondary students’ text comprehension in physics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(Suppl 1), 43-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10306-1
Hall, C., Vaughn, S., Barnes, M. A., Stewart, A. A., Austin, C. R., & Roberts, G. (2020). The effects of inference instruction on the reading comprehension of English learners with reading comprehension difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 41(5), 259-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518824983
Hattan, C., Relyea, J. E., & Gao, Y. (2026). The knowledge-comprehension connection: Activating, building, and revising knowledge during reading. In S.E. Israel (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension (pp. 302-320). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003624509
Reinita & Jannah, M. (2023). The effect of CIRC model on student learning outcomes for elementary school. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 9(3), 488-495. https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v9i3.5115
Jalil, M. K., & Ramli, M. (2025). Career Adaptability Skills in Javanese Sandur Tradition for Generation Z Career Development. Journal of Cultural Guidance and Counseling, 1(2), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.26740/jcgc.v1i2.47052
Jalil, M. K., Ramli, M., Eva, N., & Saputra, N. M. A. (2024). Fostering ethical and adaptive careers: Religious values and career readiness in generation Z. Bisma The Journal of Counseling, 8(3), 262-273. https://doi.org/10.23887/bisma.v8i3.84698
Kendeou, P., McMaster, K. L., Butterfuss, R., Kim, J., Bresina, B., & Wagner, K. (2020). The inferential language comprehension (iLC) framework: Supporting children's comprehension of visual narratives. Topics in cognitive science, 12(1), 256-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12457
Lai, H. M., Hsieh, P. J., & Yang, F. C. O. (2025). Team collaborative norms enhance students’ behavioral engagement in team-based flipped classrooms: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 241, 105468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105468
Lin, C. C., Lin, T. H., & Tang, C. K. (2025). Enhancing English reading comprehension, learning motivation and attitude through AI‐supported pre‐reading scaffolding. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(6), e70150. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70150
Lynch, K., Gonzalez, K., Hill, H., & Merritt, R. (2025). A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence linking mathematics and science professional development interventions to teacher knowledge, classroom instruction, and student achievement. AERA open, 11, 23328584251335302. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584251335302
Marsh, E., Perez Vallejos, E., & Spence, A. (2024). Overloaded by information or worried about missing out on it: A quantitative study of stress, burnout, and mental health implications in the digital workplace. Sage Open, 14(3), 21582440241268830. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241268830
Mccarthy, K. S., & Mcnamara, D. S. (2021). The multidimensional knowledge in text comprehension framework. Educational Psychologist, 56(3), 196–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1872379
Mulyono, W. D., Suparji, S., Wardhono, A., Adistana, G. A. Y. P., Suryaman, H., & Artaningtyas, D. R. (2025). Analysis of psychomotor abilities and their influence on the work readiness of vocational students in the industrial world. TEM Journal, 14(3), 2530-2536. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM143
Nada, N. M., Azizah, N., Zulaikhah, S., & Wahyudi, W. E. (2024). Learning outcomes: How does the experimentation of the CIRC models?. Inspiratif Pendidikan, 13(2), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.24252/ip.v13i2.52854
Nik Takhsami, S., Dānāye Tous, M., & Sorāhi, M. A. (2023). Frequency of the indicators of local cohesion at different levels of text representation based on Kinch's construction-integration model: Evidence from Persian textbooks for primary school, first and second cycle secondary schools. Journal of Educational Innovations, 22(2), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.22034/jei.2023.353079.2411
Nouwens, S., Groen, M. A., Kleemans, T., & Verhoeven, L. (2021). How executive functions contribute to reading comprehension. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 169-192. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12355
Rankohi, S., Bourgault, M., & Iordanova, I. (2024). The concept of integration in an IPD context: a grounded theory review. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(1), 48-72. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2022-0009
Setiyadi, R., Damayanti, V. S., Hernawan, A. H., & Agustin, M. (2025). Improving reading comprehension through a digital and intelligence-based instructional model. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 6(3), 845-856. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i3.5350
Strijker, D., Bosworth, G., & Bouter, G. (2020). Research methods in rural studies: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods. Journal of Rural Studies, 78, 262-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.06.007
Torppa, M., Vasalampi, K., Eklund, K., & Sulkunen, S. (2020). Reading comprehension difficulty is often distinct from difficulty in reading fluency and accompanied with problems in motivation and school well-being. Educational Psychology, 40(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1670334
Zammitti, A., Magnano, P., & Santisi, G. (2021). The concepts of work and decent work in relationship with self-efficacy and career adaptability: Research with quantitative and qualitative methods in adolescence. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 660721. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660721
Zhang, S., Prykanowski, D. A., & Koppenhaver, D. A. (2023). Using construction‐integration theory to interpret reading comprehension instruction for students with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(1), 126-159. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.483
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maryani, Reva Maria Valianti, Liza Murniviyanti, Arizona, Saden Nunyuli Amedome, M. Khoirudin Jalil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in journal of Professional Teacher Education agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
