Scientific reasoning and objectivity in realia-based elementary science learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/jprotect.v4i1.2196Keywords:
Realia media , Scientific method, Scientific attitude, Science learning Elementary schoolAbstract
The findings suggest that integrating claim-evidence-reasoning scaffolds into realia-based science instruction at the associating stage can strengthen students’ objectivity and reasoning skills while fostering multiple scientific attitudes in the Indonesian elementary science curriculum. This study aims to (1) describe the preparation and implementation of realia media through the scientific method, (2) analyze fifth-grade students’ scientific attitude profiles across five dimensions (curiosity, responsibility, independence, honesty, and objectivity), and (3) identify supporting and inhibiting factors. A qualitative-dominant mixed-methods case study was conducted at SDN 1 Wonogiri, a public elementary school in Wonogiri, Central Java, Indonesia. The participants included three classroom teachers and 297 fifth-grade students. Qualitative data from classroom observation and in-depth interviews were primary, complemented by descriptive data from a validated student response questionnaire, and were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman. Four dimensions developed consistently, with positive responses from 88 to 100 percent, whereas objectivity remained the most vulnerable dimension, particularly at the reasoning stage. Supporting factors included the availability of authentic objects and material relevance to daily experience; inhibiting factors included limited instructional time and students’ uneven reasoning capacity. The study provides a multidimensional profile of five attitudes, identifies reasoning capacity as strongly associated with objectivity, and reports a discrepancy between self-reported and observed objectivity. The findings imply that realia-based science instruction should incorporate claim-evidence-reasoning scaffolds at the associating stage to strengthen students’ objectivity and reasoning skills while guiding teachers in designing learning activities that simultaneously foster multiple scientific attitudes within the Indonesian elementary science curriculum.
References
Aiman, U., Hasyda, S., & Uslan, U. (2020). The influence of process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) model assisted by realia media to improve scientific literacy and critical thinking skill of primary school students. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1635–1647. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1635
Althof, W., & Berkowitz, M. W. (2006). Moral education and character education: Their relationship and roles in citizenship education. Journal of Moral Education, 35(4), 495–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240601012204
Appleton, K. (2003). How do beginning primary school teachers cope with science? Toward an understanding of science teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 33(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023666618800
Avery, L. M. (2013). Rural science education: Valuing local knowledge. Theory Into Practice, 52(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2013.743769
Belenky, D. M., & Nokes, T. J. (2009). Examining the role of manipulatives and metacognition on engagement, learning, and transfer. The Journal of Problem Solving, 2(2), 102–129. https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1061
Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3), 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20186
Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2004). Research-based character education. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203260082
Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373–1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500498419
Bybee, R., McCrae, B., & Laurie, R. (2009). PISA 2006: An assessment of scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 865–883. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20333
Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013). Inquiry-based instruction and teaching about nature of science: Are they happening? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 497–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9314-z
Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034003003
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
Erlina, N., Susantini, E., Wasis, Wicaksono, I., & Pandiangan, P. (2018). The effectiveness of evidence-based reasoning in inquiry-based physics teaching to increase students’ scientific reasoning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(6), 972–985. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.972
Faisal, & Martin, S. N. (2019). Science education in Indonesia: Past, present, and future. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0032-0
Fensham, P. J. (2009). Real world contexts in PISA science: Implications for context-based science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 884–896. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20334
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
Ford, M. J. (2012). A dialogic account of sense-making in scientific argumentation and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 30(3), 207–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2012.689383
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
Holstermann, N., Grube, D., & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Hands-on activities and their influence on students’ interest. Research in Science Education, 40(5), 743–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9142-0
Kang, J., & Keinonen, T. (2018). The effect of student-centered approaches on students’ interest and achievement in science: Relevant topic-based, open and guided inquiry-based, and discussion-based approaches. Research in Science Education, 48(4), 865–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9590-2
Kind, P., Jones, K., & Barmby, P. (2007). Developing attitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education, 29(7), 871–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600909091
Krumpal, I. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 2025–2047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9
Lalian, O. N., Siregar, E., & Winarsih, M. (2019). The effects of using realia media on increasing science learning outcomes of elementary school students: A meta-analysis. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Part F1483, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3323771.3323775
McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20201
Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction—what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
Navarro, M., Förster, C., González, C., & González-Pose, P. (2016). Attitudes toward science: Measurement and psychometric properties of the Test of Science-Related Attitudes for its use in Spanish-speaking classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 38(9), 1459–1482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1195521
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183944
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
Özden, M. (2020). Elementary school students’ informal reasoning and its quality regarding socio-scientific issues. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 20(86), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2020.86.4
Parmiti, D. P., Rediani, N. N., Antara, I. G. W. S., & Jayadiningrat, M. G. (2021). The effectiveness of local culture-integrated science learning through project-based assessment on scientific attitudes and science process skills of elementary school students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3), 439–446. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i3.31301
Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
Roehrig, G. H., & Kruse, R. A. (2005). The role of teachers’ beliefs and knowledge in the adoption of a reform-based curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 105(8), 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18061.x
Rohaeti, E., Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Irwanto, I. (2020). Research-oriented collaborative inquiry learning model: Improving students’ scientific attitudes in general chemistry. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(1), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.108
Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science Education, 92(3), 447–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20276
Sasse, H., Weber, A. M., Reuter, T., & Leuchter, M. (2025). Teacher guidance and on-the-fly scaffolding in primary school students’ inquiry learning. Science Education, 109(2), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21921
Suyanto, S. (2018). The implementation of the scientific approach through 5Ms of the new curriculum of 2013 in Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v37i1.18719
Swarat, S., Ortony, A., & Revelle, W. (2012). Activity matters: Understanding student interest in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21010
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
Wicaksono, A. G. C., & Korom, E. (2023). Attitudes towards science in higher education: Validation of questionnaire among science teacher candidates and engineering students in Indonesia. Heliyon, 9(9), e20023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20023
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zacharia, Z. C., & Olympiou, G. (2011). Physical versus virtual manipulative experimentation in physics learning. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.03.001
Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lilik Bangun Yunianto, Kartika Chrysti Suryandari, Septi Triyani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in journal of Professional Teacher Education agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
