Measuring tools to help professional teachers: Valid and reliable perfectionist academic scale tools for students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/jprotect.v2i2.1334Keywords:
Perfectionist academic, Measurement tool, Valid, RealibelAbstract
Every student hopes to succeed academically, but some students tend towards academic perfectionism, which can impact conditions at school. Professional teachers need to detect these characteristics, but there are no specific measuring instruments for elementary and secondary school students. Therefore, this study aims to develop and test the validity and reliability of the academic perfectionist scale. This scale was developed based on five main aspects: not taking assignments as a burden, being disciplined and consistent, having high grades, being afraid of failure, and having negative views of others. The research method used is a mixed sequential exploration, which combines qualitative and quantitative approaches in stages. Scale arranged from a literature review validated by experts and then analyzed qualitatively. Then, there is an empirical test using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with 108 respondents from Indonesia and Pakistan. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy (KMO MSA) results of 0.736 indicate that the data is sufficient for factor analysis. Of the 28 initial items, 24 have adequate validity with a loading factor value of ≥ 0.55. The reliability test with Cronbach’s Alpha produced a value of 0.718, indicating good internal consistency. This academic perfectionist scale is valid and reliable as a measuring tool for students’ academic perfectionism tendencies, which apply to educational and counselling interventions. The novelty is that this measuring tool applies at the elementary school level, from grade 3 to high school students (teenagers). However, further research is needed to test the external validity of this scale on a broader population.
References
Alyahyan, E., & Düştegör, D. (2020). Predicting academic success in higher education: Literature review and best practices. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0177-7
Belur, J., Tompson, L., Thornton, A., & Simon, M. (2021). Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(2), 837–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799372
Brandt, W. C. (2020). Measuring student success skills: A review of the literature on self-directed learning. 21st century success skills. Center for Assessment.
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford publications.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2019). Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1412-1427. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000626
Collin, V., O’Selmo, E., & Whitehead, P. (2020). Stress, psychological distress, burnout and perfectionism in UK dental students. British Dental Journal, 229(9), 605–614. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-2281-4
D’Agostino, R. B. (2017). Goodness-of-fit-techniques. Routledge.
Damian, L. E., Stoeber, J., Negru‐Subtirica, O., & Băban, A. (2017). On the development of perfectionism: The longitudinal role of academic achievement and academic efficacy. Journal of Personality, 85(4), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12261
Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2021). A growth mindset about intelligence. In G. M. Walton & A. J. Crum (Eds.), Handbook of wise interventions: How social psychology can help people change (pp. 9–35). The Guilford Press.
Fang, J., & Sotardi, V. (2023). The “Perfect” balance: The Intersection of perfectionism profiles, achievement goals, and academic performance among first-year university students. In G. H. Lee & A. J. Lee (Eds.), Achievement Goals, and Academic Performance Among First-Year University Students (pp. 101-121). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4589220
Fernández-García, O., Gil-Llario, M. D., Castro-Calvo, J., Morell-Mengual, V., Ballester-Arnal, R., & Estruch-García, V. (2022). Academic perfectionism, psychological well-being, and suicidal ideation in college students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010085
Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L., Su, C., & Flett, K. D. (2016). Perfectionism in language learners: Review, conceptualization, and recommendations for teachers and school psychologists. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 31(2), 75–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573516638462
Gueldner, B. A., Feuerborn, L. L., & Merrell, K. W. (2020). Social and emotional learning in the classroom: Promoting mental health and academic success. Guilford Publications.
Hartini, S., Mulyana, A. R., Abidah, J., & Sabri, F. (2023). Seven insecure academic conditions for students as a basis for implementing teacher professional learning. Journal of Professional Teacher Education, 1(2), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.12928/jprotect.v1i2.654
Kaya, M., & Erdem, C. (2021). Students’ Well-Being and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study. Child Indicators Research, 14(5), 1743–1767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-021-09821-4
Killen, R., & O’Toole, M. (2023). Effective teaching strategies 8e. Cengage AU.
Kumar, C. (2020). Psychosocial well-being of individuals. In W. Leal Filho, A. M. Azul, L. Brandli, P. G. Özuyar, & T. Wall (Eds.), Quality Education (pp. 676–686). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95870-5_45
Kumar, V. (2020). Perfectionism: An ethical theory of the soul. Research Review, International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 5(6), 128–130. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2020.v05.i06.026
Kurtovic, A., Vrdoljak, G., & Idzanovic, A. (2019). Predicting procrastination: The role of academic achievement, self-efficacy and perfectionism. International Journal of Educational Psychology: Ijep, 8(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2019.2993
Lee, Y. J., & Anderman, E. M. (2020). Profiles of perfectionism and their relations to educational outcomes in college students: The moderating role of achievement goals. Learning and Individual Differences, 77, 101813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101813
Likert, R. (2017). The method of constructing an attitude scale. In Scaling (pp. 233–242). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315128948-23
Liu, C., & Berzenski, S. R. (2022). College Academic perfectionism scale: Development and validation. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 40(4), 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829211069799
Madigan, D. J. (2019). A meta-analysis of perfectionism and academic achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 967–989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09484-2
McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
Mishra, S. (2020). Social networks, social capital, social support and academic success in higher education: A systematic review with a special focus on ‘underrepresented’students. Educational Research Review, 29, 100307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100307
Moningka, Y., Aprilia, N., & Isnaeni, B. (2024). North Sumatra Busedah to strengthen students’ character and implementation through the fun school. Journal of Professional Teacher Education, 2(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.12928/jprotect.v2i1.730
Myrick, R. D. (1987). Developmental guidance and counseling: A practical approach. Educational Media Corporation.
Osenk, I., Williamson, P., & Wade, T. D. (2020). Does perfectionism or pursuit of excellence contribute to successful learning? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 32(10), 972. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000942
Perry, J. L., Nicholls, A. R., Clough, P. J., & Crust, L. (2015). Assessing model fit: Caveats and recommendations for confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 19(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2014.952370
Prudon, P. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis as a tool in research using questionnaires: A critique. Comprehensive Psychology, 4, 03.CP.4.10. https://doi.org/10.2466/03.CP.4.10
Rice, K. G., Richardson, C. M. E., & Ray, M. E. (2016). Perfectionism in academic settings. In F. M. Sirois & D. S. Molnar (Eds.), Perfectionism, Health, and Well-Being (pp. 245–264). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18582-8_11
Roksa, J., & Kinsley, P. (2019). The role of family support in facilitating academic success of low-income students. Research in Higher Education, 60, 415–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9517-z
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
Seong, H., Lee, S., & Chang, E. (2021). Perfectionism and academic burnout: Longitudinal extension of the bifactor model of perfectionism. Personality and Individual Differences, 172, 110589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110589
Shrestha, N. (2021). Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-9-1-2
Supriyanto, A. (2016). Collaboration counselor and parent for developing student spiritual competency through comprehensive guidance and counseling service. Jurnal Fokus Konseling, 2(1), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.52657/jfk.v2i1.131
Supriyanto, A., Imtinan, S., Arikunto, S., Handaka, I. B., & Hartini, S. (2024). Academic burnout conditions in indonesian students: physical, mental, and emotional. Educatione, 2(2), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.59397/edu.v2i2.26
Supriyanto, A., Saputra, W. N., Handaka, I. B., Barida, M., Widyastuti, D. A., Muyana, S., Wahyudi, A., & Sari, M. D. (2022). Student problem assessment (SPA) in the covid-19 condition in terms of 10 sub areas of life problems (10-ALP). Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 12(1), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.01.20
Sürücü, L., & Maslakci, A. (2020). Validity and reliability in quantitative research. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(3), 2694–2726. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1540
Sutoyo, A., & Supriyanto, A. (2015). Development Personality/Social Competency of Secondary High School Students trough A Comprehensive Guidance and Counseling Program. Jurnal Fokus Konseling, 1(2), 82-92. https://doi.org/10.52657/jfk.v1i2.95
Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 315–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1
Whitten, C., Labby, S., & Sullivan, S. L. (2019). The impact of pleasure reading on academic success. Journal of Multidisciplinary Graduate Research, 2(1), 48-64.
Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2020). What can be learned from growth mindset controversies? American Psychologist, 75(9), 1269–1284. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000794
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Professional Teacher Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in journal of Professional Teacher Education agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
