The discursive construction of sedition in contemporary Hong Kong
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/xhjhr730Keywords:
Critical discourse analysis, Hong Kong, Presupposition, National security, Political identityAbstract
This article examines how sedition is discursively constructed in Hong Kong through legal and institutional discourse, particularly in relation to publications, and how these constructions reflect changing relationships between political authority, communication, and security across changing constitutional contexts. Drawing on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), the study analyses three interconnected processes: the historical recontextualisation of sedition from a Crown-based constitutional framework into a post-handover sovereignty framework; the presuppositions of political authority, belonging, and loyalty embedded within contemporary sedition discourse; and the securitisation of publications and communicative practices. The analysis examines colonial and contemporary sedition-related legal provisions, together with official institutional discourse surrounding recent publication-related investigations. Through the discussion of the Sheep Village case and the 2026 bookstore investigation, the article demonstrates that sedition is not a fixed legal category but a discourse whose meaning changes according to broader constructions of authority and legitimacy. While colonial sedition law was embedded within a framework of loyalty towards the Crown, contemporary sedition discourse presupposes the legitimacy of the post-handover constitutional order and increasingly frames challenges to that order as forms of political disaffection or security risk. The article argues that the transformation of sedition in Hong Kong reflects broader struggles over constitutional identity, political belonging, and the boundaries of legitimate communication.
References
Benesch, S. (1996). Needs analysis and curriculum development in EAP: An example of a critical approach. TESOL Quarterly, 30(4), 723-738. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587931
Chan, J. (2022, December 17). Johannes Chan: The village of the sheep case (HKSAR v Lai Man-ling). HKU legal scholarship blog. https://researchblog.law.hku.hk/2022/12/johannes-chan-village-of-sheep-case.html
Chun, C. W. (2015). Power and meaning making in an EAP classroom (1st ed. ed.). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092956
Crimes Ordinance (Cap. 200) 1971 (Hong Kong).
Department of Justice of the Government of the HKSAR. (2023, December). Annotations of the Hong Kong National Security Law and sedition offences in the Crimes Ordinance. https://www.hknslannot.gov.hk/en/home/index.html
Ebner, N., & Peck, J. (2022). FANTASY ISLAND: Paul Romer and the multiplication of Hong Kong. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 46(1), 26-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13060
Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3. edn). Routledge.
Flowerdew, J. (1997). The discourse of colonial withdrawal: A case study in the creation of mythic discourse. Discourse & Society, 8(4), 453-477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008004002
Flowerdew, J. (2004). Identity politics and Hong Kong’s return to Chinese sovereignty: Analysing the discourse of Hong Kong’s first chief executive. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(9), 1551-1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.002
Flowerdew, J. (2011). Critical discourse analysis in historiography: The case of Hong Kong's evolving political identity (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230336841
Flowerdew, J. (2016). A historiographical approach to Hong Kong Occupy. Journal of Language and Politics, 15(5), 529-548. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15.5.02flo
Flowerdew, J. (2017). Understanding the Hong Kong umbrella movement. Discourse & Society, 28(5), 453-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517710991
Flowerdew, J., & Leong, S. (2007). Metaphors in the discursive construction of patriotism: The case of Hong Kong's constitutional reform debate. Discourse & Society, 18(3), 273-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507075476
Government of the HKSAR. (2026, July 15). Police National Security Department arrests two men and three women [Press release]. https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/202607/15/P2026071500976.htm
Iu, I. (2025a). ‘Revolution of our times’: Stateless nationalism and the work of slogans in the Hong Kong diaspora. Nations and Nationalism (online), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.70030
Iu, I. (2025b). Two nationalisms, one city: Official and diasporic framings of the 2019 Hong Kong protests. Nations and Nationalism (online), 1-16. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nana.70014
The Law of the People’s Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region 2020 (Hong Kong)
Leung, J. H. C. (2024). Sedition or mere dissent? Linguistic analysis of a political slogan. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law = Revue Internationale De Sémiotique Juridique, 37(2), 647–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10042-x
McConnell, F. (2009). De facto, displaced, tacit: The sovereign articulations of the Tibetan Government-in-Exile. Political Geography, 28(6), 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.04.001
McConnell, F. (2016). Rehearsing the state: The political practices of the Tibetan Government-in-Exile (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118661192
Ng, T. W. C. (2020). Recontextualisation of Beijing’s voice: A critical discourse analysis of hegemony and resistance in Hong Kong political discourse. Discourse & Society, 31(5), 540-561. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520914683
Safeguarding National Security Ordinance 2024 (Hong Kong).
Statham, S. (2022). Critical discourse analysis: A practical introduction to power in language. Routledge.
Tang, A. (2022). The parasites of language. Language and Dialogue, 12(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00110.tan
Tang, W. (2014). (Re) imaginings of Hong Kong: Voices from the Hong Kong diaspora and their children. Journal of Chinese Overseas, 10(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1163/17932548-12341275
Wang, J. (2017). Discursive strategies and identity construction: A study based on the PAs of the HK governments pre- and post-transition. Jinan University Press.
Wodak, R., & Fairclough, N. (2010). Recontextualizing European higher education policies: The cases of Austria and Romania. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(1), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900903453922
Wong, K. H. (2024). From mass protests to national security: A critical analysis of Carrie Lam’s political responses during the 2019 Hong Kong protests. Journal of Postcolonial Linguistics, 10, 1-25. https://iacpl.net/jopol/issues/journal-of-postcolonial-linguistics-10-2024/from-mass-protests-to-national-security/
Wong, K. H. (2025a). A Critical EAP perspective on “Glory to Hong Kong”: Language, identity, and resistance. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 8(2), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v8i2.14037
Wong, K. H. (2025b). Discursive sovereignty: How China constructs Hong Kong as an “internal affair”. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 8(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v8i1.116-137
Wong, K. H. (2025c, September 30). Is patriotism just obedience? Hong Kong under the National Security Law. E-International Relations. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/190244
Wong, K. H. (2025d). Liberate Hong Kong? Language, agency, and imagining political futures. Teaching English as a Foreign Language Journal, 4(2), 84-96. https://doi.org/10.12928/tefl.v4i2.1705
Wong, K. H. (2026a). From British nationality to political resistance: BN(O) status and the vision for a Hong Kong Crown Dependency [Doctoral thesis, University of Technology Sydney]. Open Publications of UTS Scholars. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/195450
Wong, K. H. (2026b). The irony of Thatcher’s political miscalculation: A critical discourse historiographical analysis of British nationality classes in Hong Kong. CADAAD Journal, 18(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.21827/cadaad.18.1.42479
Wong, K. H. (2026c). Political resistance in Sheep Village: The politics of metaphors and their pedagogical implications. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 9(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v9i1.15191
Wong, K. H. (2026d). Regulating speech: A comparative analysis of Australia’s racial vilification offence and Hong Kong’s National Security Law. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 8(2), 483-509. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v8i2.483-509
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in TEFL Journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the TEFL Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in TEFL Journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in TEFL Journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
