Fluency before accuracy: A methodology for unlocking productive speech in EFL learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/tefl.v5i2.1793Keywords:
Fluency-First Approach, EFL speaking, Grammatical accuracy, Learner confidence, Productive skills, Language teaching methodologyAbstract
This quasi-experimental study examines the effects of a "Fluency-First Approach" (FFA) on EFL learners' speaking skills. Conducted with pre-intermediate students at Alamein International University, the research compared an experimental group (n=35) receiving fluency-focused instruction against a control group (n=33) following traditional accuracy-focused methods. During the 12-week intervention, data were collected through recorded speaking tasks analyzed for fluency metrics and grammatical accuracy, along with confidence questionnaires. Results demonstrated that the FFA group achieved significantly greater improvements in all fluency measures: speech rate, mean length of run, and phonation/time ratio (p < .001, d > 1.0), all yielding large effect sizes. Notably, despite minimal error correction, the FFA group also showed superior gains in grammatical accuracy (p = .005, d = 0.74). Questionnaire data revealed substantially increased speaking confidence and reduced anxiety in the experimental group (p < .001). Correlation analyses indicated strong relationships between fluency development, accuracy gains, and confidence growth. These findings align with skill acquisition and usage-based theories of second language acquisition, supporting the notion that prioritizing fluency creates a virtuous cycle of practice and automatization that ultimately enhances overall speaking proficiency. The study provides empirical evidence for pedagogical approaches that initially emphasize communication flow over grammatical precision, contributing to the growing body of research on fluency-first methodologies in EFL speaking instruction.
References
Abdulaal, M. A., & Al-Johani, H. M. (2024). The impact of the dynamicity and non-dynamicity of assessment on EFL learners’ productive skills: Attitude in focus. World Journal of English Language, 14(3), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n3p87
Astawa, N. L. P. N. S. P., Artini, L. P., & Nitiasih, P. K. (2017). Project-based learning activities and efl students’ productive skills in english. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(6), 1147–1155. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0806.16
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Davies, N. F. (1976). Receptive Versus Productive Skills in Foreign Language Learning. Modern Language Journal, 60(8), 440–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1976.tb03667.x
DeKeyser, R. (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Gholami, R., Noordin, N., & Mustapha, G. (2013). Investigating EFL students’ EAP needs on productive skills in Malaysian universities. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 21(3), 995–1017. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84903942176&partnerID=40&md5=821758a06776147e9869fc1b398f07e1
Gonzalez-Torres, P., Cabrera-Solano, P., & Castillo-Cuesta, L. (2022). Exploring perceptions of online feedback in teaching EFL speaking and writing skills during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(7), 330–344. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.7.17
Hamad, M. M., & Dafaallah, A. S. (2024). The Pros and Cons of Teaching English language speaking skills online from the points of view of EFL teachers at King Khalid University’s (KKU’s) Tehama Campus. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(1), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1501.32
Horwitz, E. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112–126.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited, Longman. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jd.2002.58.3.319.1
Kaviani, M., & Heidar, D. M. (2020). The effectiveness of critical thinking on enhancing productive skills among Iranian EFL pre-intermediate learners. Applied Research on English Language, 9(3), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2019.118748.1489
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition.
Krebt, D. M. (2023). The Correlation between EFL Learners’ Academic Intelligence and the Level of Productive Skills. Arab World English Journal, 14(3), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no3.1
Miralpeix, I., & Muñoz, C. (2018). Receptive vocabulary size and its relationship to EFL language skills. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 56(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0016
Nguyen, L. V, & Pham, A. T. D. (2021). Using synchronous online discussion to develop EFL learners’ productive skills: A case study. Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(1), 179–207. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.1.11.179
Pham, D. H. (2019). Nominalization versus clause usage in CALL technology-mediated acquisition of EFL learners’ writing skills. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 9(2), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJVPLE.2019070105
Riswanto, n., Teferi, H., & Ahmed Abdel-Al Ibrahim, K. (2023). Cultivating EFL learners’ productive skills by employing dynamic and non-dynamic assessments: attitude in focus. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00228-2
Rozimela, Y., Fatimah, S., Adnan, A., & Tresnadewi, S. (2024). EFL teachers’ perceived productive skills for effective teacher professional development program. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(3), 1493–1514. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i3.37277
Salimi, E. A., & Najjarpour, M. (2024). Beyond language proficiency: Navigating EFL teachers’ relationship skills competence through their perceptions and strategies in the classroom. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100814
Segalowitz, N. (2003). Automaticity and second languages. The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 382–408.
Soto-Corominas, A., Roquet, H., & Segura, M. (2024). The Effects of CLIL and sources of individual differences on receptive and productive EFL skills at the onset of Primary School. Applied Linguistics, 45(2), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad031
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. Input in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165–179.
Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–483). Routledge.
Tedeneke, A. (2022). Exploring the practices and contextual factors in teaching writing skills in EFL Classrooms: A case study. Ethiopian Renaissance Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.4314/erjssh.v9i2.6
Yacoub, E. (2022). Needs analysis of teaching English for specific purposes for secondary students applying to medical faculties. International Journal of Curriculum & Technological Education, 6(9), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.21608/ijcte.2022.116269.1036
Yacoub, E. (2023). A program based on English for specific purposes to enhance scientific literacy among secondary students (A Multidimensional Study). International Journal of Curriculum & Technological Education, 10(17), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.21608/ijcte.2023.200559.1079
Yacoub, E. (2024a). A Proposed Framework for Developing EFL curriculum for secondary stage in the light of CLIL Approach. International Journal of Curriculum & Technological Education, 15(27), 36–69. https://doi.org/10.21608/ijcte.2024.256082.1105
Yacoub, E. (2024b). The Effectiveness of CLIL based curriculum in Developing esp reading and writing skills for secondary students. International Journal of Curriculum & Technological Education, 15(26), 17–45. https://doi.org/10.21608/ijcte.2024.256084.1106
Yacoub, E. (2025a). Aligning English language instruction with engineering needs: comprehensive needs analysis framework for ESP syllabus design. Anatolian Journal of Education, 10(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2025.10215a
Yacoub, E. (2025b). Designing a CLIL Based Esp curriculum for computer science and engineering programs at Alamein International University. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 17(1), 78–100. https://doi.org/https://ijci.net/index.php/IJCI/article/view/1525/751
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in TEFL Journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the TEFL Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in TEFL Journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in TEFL Journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
