The psychology of the character Daruma in the novels Daruma-san and Daruma-san returns by Fida Husna

Authors

  • Desti Fatin Fauziyyah Universitas Pasundan image/svg+xml
  • Ahmad Zulfahmi Ubaidillah Universitas Sangga Buana
  • Dewi Nawang Sari Universitas Pasundan image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26555/bs.v46i2.2060

Keywords:

Character personality, Daruma , Fida Husna , Psychology

Abstract

Fida Husna novels Daruma-san and Daruma-san Returns depict the complexity of the character Daruma through the psychological transformation of an antagonist who experiences inner conflict due to the injustices of fate throughout his life. This qualitative descriptive study examines the dynamics of the character’s personality using a literary psychology approach based on the Hippocratic typology. Data were collected through observation, labeling, classification, and recording, and were then described and summarized to gain a comprehensive understanding of the consistency of the character’s personality. The results of the study show that Daruma’s personality underwent a change from a predominantly sanguine character full of empathy to a choleric one cruel and vengeful. This change was triggered by the interaction between internal factors namely, the grief-induced trauma resulting from his mother’s death and external factors namely, socio-political crises, economic crises, and betrayal. The novelist deliberately crafted these emotional conflicts to build the complexity of the fictional character. This finding makes a scientific contribution to the development of literary psychology, particularly in understanding the continuity, change, and narrative construction of the character’s personality across the two sequels.

References

Al-Ma’ruf, A. I., & Nugrahani, F. (2017). Pengkajian sastra teori dan aplikasi (K. Saddhono, Ed. Cetakan 1). CV. Djiwa Amarta Press. https://www.academia.edu/download/89140508/Buku_Pengkajian_Sastra.pdf

Amalia, D., Fauziyyah, D. F., & Suratiningsih, M. (2025). Representasi nilai sosial dalam cerpen Zamrud karya Danarto: Kajian sosiologi sastra. Jurnal Bastra, 11(1), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.36709/bastra.v11i1.1953

American Psychological Association. (2003). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (4th ed., pp. 495–512). https://doi.org/10.1037/14805-030

Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. Kamus besar bahasa Indonesia. https://kbbi.web.id/

Berger, K. S. (2003). The developing person through childhood and adolescence. Worth Publishers.

Blasi, A. (2005). Moral character: A psychological approach. In D. K. Lapsley & F. C. Power (Eds.), Character psychology and character education. University of Notre Dame Press (pp. 67–110). https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-09547-003

Cahyo, A. N., Manullang, T. A. A., & Isnan, M. (2020). Analisis penggunaan gaya bahasa sarkasme pada lagu Bahaya Komunis karangan Jason Ranti. Asas: Jurnal Sastra, 9(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.24114/ajs.v9i1.18329

Daniel & Lawrence. (2011). Kepribadian teori dan penelitian. Salemba Humanika.

Dewan Dictionery. (1985). Kamus dewan. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka (DBP) Malaysia. https://dbp.gov.my/

Endraswara, S. (2008). Metodologi penelitian sastra. Media Pressindo.

___________. (2013). Metodologi penelitian sastra (Cetakan 1). CAPS (Center for Academic Publish).

Faiz, A., Kurniawaty, I., & Purwati, P. (2022). Teori kepribadian personality plus perspektif Florence Littauer. EDUKATIF: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(4), 5196–5202. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i4.2976

Fauziyyah, D. F., & Sumiyadi. (2020). Nilai-nilai didaktis dalam novel Burung-Burung Kecil karya Kembangmanggis. Jurnal Semantik, 9(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.22460/semantik.v9i1.p41-50

Fikri, I. F., Ismail, S. N., Zainiyati, H. S., & Kholis, N. (2023). Struktur kepribadian manusia dalam psikoanalisis Sigmund Freud: Perspektif filsafat pendidikan Islam. Edupedia: Jurnal Studi Pendidikan dan Pedagogi Islam, 8(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.35316/edupedia.v8i1.2787

Hidayah, R. F. (2021). Nilai perjuangan dalam novel Rapijali 1: Mencari karya Dewi Lestari. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://repository.unmuhjember.ac.id/11991/

Hogan, R. (1973). Moral conduct and moral character: A psychological perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 79(4), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033956

Husna, F. (2018). Daruma-san. PT Mizan Pustaka. https://www.gramedia.com/products/fantasteendaruma-san

___________. (2019). Daruma-san returns. PT Mizan Pustaka. https://www.gramedia.com/products/fantasteendaruma-san-returns

Kadir, A. (2015). Menyusun dan menganalisis tes hasil belajar Abdul Kadir. Al-Ta’dib, 8(2), 70–81. https://ejournal.iainkendari.ac.id/index.php/al-tadib/article/view/411/396

Ladola, S. (2022). Analisis karakter tokoh utama novel Tikungan Maut karya Kisah Tanah Jawa: Kajian psikologi sastra [Skripsi, UMSU]. http://repository.umsu.ac.id/handle/123456789/17689

Luxemburg, J. V., Bal, M., & Weststeijn, W. G. (1984). Pengantar ilmu sastra (Terjemahan Dick Hartoko). PT Gramedia. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Pengantar_ilmu_sastra.html?id=2h7CnQEACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. COMM, 34(4), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.025

Minderop, A. (2010). Psikologi sastra: Karya sastra, metode, teori, dan contoh kasus (2nd ed.). Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Nuryanti, M., & Sobari, T. (2019). Analisis kajian psikologi sastra pada novel Pulang karya Leila S. Chudori. Parole: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 2(4), 501–506.

Oatley, K. (1994). A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics, 23(1–2), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)P4296-S

Pradnyana, W. G., Artawan, G., & Sutama, M. (2019). Psikologi tokoh dalam novel Suti karya Sapardi Djoko Damono: Analisis psikologi sastra. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 3(3), 339–347. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v3i3.21844

Pratama, T. (2017). Tes dan hasil tes psikologi galen. Personality Plus, Florence Littauer.

Prawira, P. A. (2014). Psikologi umum dengan perspektif baru (Cetakan II). Ar-Ruzz Media. https://id.scribd.com/document/496655149/Psikologi-Umum-Dengan-Perspektif-Baru-Purwa-Atmaja-Prawira

Prawito, A. (2021). Klasifikasi karakteristik kepribadian manusia berdasarkan tipologi hippocrates galenus menggunakan metode naïve-bayes. Seminar Nasional Inovasi Teknologi, 5(1), 133–140. https://proceeding.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/inotek/article/view/917

Putri, F. A., Vardani, E. N. A., & Anggraeni, A. W. (2023). Kajian psikologi sastra tokoh utama dalam novel Pancarona karya Erisca Febriani. Belajar Bahasa: Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 8(2), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.32528/bb.v8i2.373

Ratna, N. K. (2007). Teori, metode, dan teknik pengkajian sastra. Pustaka Pelajar.

Sahir, S. H. (2021). Metodologi penelitian (Cetakan 1). KBM Indonesia.

Sembiring, L. M. B. R., Harmaen, D., & Fauziyyah, D. F. (2021). Analisis konflik batin tokoh dalam novel Ivanna van Dijk karya Risa Saraswati. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 2(1), 16–21. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/JPBSI/article/view/68457

Semi, M. A. (1993). Metode penelitian sastra. Angkasa.

Setyorini, R. (2017). Analisis kepribadian tokoh Marni kajian psikologi Sigmund Freud dalam novel Entrok karya Okky Madasari. Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, 2(1), 12–24. https://journals.ums.ac.id/KLS/article/view/5348

Siswanto, W. (2008). Pengantar teori sastra. Grasindo.

Sobur, A. (2003). Psikologi umum dalam lintas sejarah. Pustaka Setia. https://id.scribd.com/document/380853524/PSIKOLOGI-UMUM#page=385

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian bisnis: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, kombinasi dan R&D (19th ed.). Alfabeta. https://archive.org/details/buku-metode-penelitian-sugiyono/page/n4/mode/1up

Suharianto, S. (1982). Dasar-dasar teori sastra. Widya Duta. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Dasar_dasar_teori_sastra.html?id=Flv4GgAACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Sunendar, D., & Adriany, V. (2023). It’s all about the product’: Doing research in neoliberal times in Indonesian higher education. Globalisation, Societies, and Education, 23(3), 784–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2023.2212438

Suryabrata, S. (2005). Psikologi pendidikan. PT Rajagrafindo. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Psikologi_pendidikan.html?id=ewiyAQAACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Syah, M. (1999). Psikologi pendidikan dengan pendekatan baru. PT Remaja Rosdakarya. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=61n7jwEACAAJ

Syahfitri, D. (2018). Teori sastra konsep dan metode. In S. Sari (Ed.), Angewandte Chemie International Edition (Cetakan 1). Pustaka Ilmu Yogyakarta. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353750201_TEORI_SASTRA_Pustaka_Ilmu_Yogyakarta

Teeuw, A. (1983). Membaca dan menilai sastra: Kumpulan karangan (2nd ed.). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Toenlioe, A. J. (2021). Pendekatan penelitian kualitatif bidang pendidikan: Landasan, teori, dan panduan. Ahlimedia Press. https://digilib-pps.insuriponorogo.ac.id/file_buku/b74eaf4b608c7ce7efce9c5e42af75cf.pdf

Wahyuni, R., & Ambarwati, A. (2023). Pertentangan psikologis tokoh ping dalam novel Rapijali 1 Mencari karya Dee Lestari: Kajian Carl Rogers. Salingka, Majalah Ilmiah Bahasa, dan Sastra, 20(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.26499/salingka.v20i1.820

Wellek, R., & Warren, A. (1993). Teori Kesusastraan diindonesiakan oleh Melani Budianta. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Teori_kesusastraan.html?id=5bBUAAAACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Wicaksono, A. (2014). Pengkajian prosa fiksi (edisi revisi) (Fahrurrozi, Ed.). Garudhawaca. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=4OmtDgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dg#v=onepage&q&f=false

Zaviera, F. (2020). Teori kepribadian Sigmund Freud. Prismasophie.

Additional Files

Published

2026-08-18

Issue

Section

Articles