Comparing the Effectiveness of Hashtags in Digital Social Movements: A Case Study of #PercumaLaporPolisi and #PolriSesuaiProsedur in Indonesia

Authors

  • Zuraida Zuraida Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/channel.v11i1.339

Keywords:

hashtag activism, social movement, framing alignment, hashtag

Abstract

Hashtags are used in digital social movements to mobilize netizens and create social change. This study aims to fill in gaps from previous studies by comparing the hashtags #PercumaLaporPolisi and #PolriSesuaiProsedur, which emerged on Twitter as social movements in response to the rape of three children under ten in East Luwu, South Sulawesi. The study incorporates framing analysis and focuses on the frame alignment process to see the efforts of the hashtags #PercumaLaporPolisi and #PolriSesuaiProsedur on mobilizing social media users. This study uses Social Network Analysis (SNA) to analyze the network structure formed from #PercumaLaporPolisi vs. #PolriSesuaiProsedur hashtags and determine the values of reciprocity, centralization, diameter, density, and modularity. The researcher also uses framing alignment analysis to analyze the tweets collected using Python from October 6-17, 2021, and Netlytic software as a tool. This text compares the effectiveness of two Twitter hashtags, #PercumaLaporPolisi, and #PolriSesuaiProsedur, in mobilizing supporters during a campaign about police policies in Indonesia. Network analysis found that #PolriSesuaiProsedur had a more extensive network, higher density, and more robust framing than #PercumaLaporPolisi, which resulted in a more effective mobilization of supporters. The text emphasizes the importance of precise messaging and framing in hashtag activism. This study compared the success of two hashtags, #PercumaLaporPolisi, and #PolriSesuaiProsedur, and found that #PolriSesuaiProsedur was more successful due to its clear framing. This research highlights the significance of precise framing in hashtags for mobilizing supporters in digital social movements. Future studies could investigate the impact of various hashtags on mobilization.

References

Barisione, M., & Ceron, A. (2017). A Digital Movement of Opinion? Contesting Austerity Through Social Media. In Social Media and European Politics (pp. 77–104). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59890-5_4

Barisione, M., Michailidou, A., & Airoldi, M. (2017). Understanding a digital movement of opinion: the case of #RefugeesWelcome. Information Communication and Society, 22(8), 1145–1164. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1410204

Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing Process and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26. www.annualreviews.org

Bonilla, Y., & Rosa, J. (2015). #Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States. American Ethnologist, 42(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12112

Boyd, D. (2007). Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, Identity, and Digital Media (pp. 119–142). MIT University Press.

Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2015). Twitter Hashtags from Ad Hoc to Calculated Publics. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/46515/.

Clark, R. (2016). “Hope in a hashtag”: the discursive activism of #WhyIStayed. Feminist Media Studies, 16(5), 788–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2016.1138235

de Vydt, M., & Ketelaars, P. (2021). Linking consensus to action: does frame alignment amongst sympathizers lead to protest participation? Social Movement Studies, 20(4), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1770071

Detik.com. (2021). Polisi Lawan Tagar #PercumaLaporPolisi dengan #PolriSesuaiProsedur. . Https://News.Detik.Com/Berita/d-5762516/Polisi-Lawan-Tagar-Percumalaporpolisi-Dengan-Polrisesuaiprosedur.

Eriyanto. (2014). Analisis jaringan komunikasi : strategi baru dalam penelitian ilmu komunikasi dan ilmu sosial lainnya. Prenadamedia Group. ISBN 978-602-1186-48-0

Hootsuite. (2021). Digital 2021 Indonesia.

Hootsuite. (2022). Digital 2022 Indonesia.

Howard, P. N., Savage, S., Saviaga, C. F., Toxtli, C., & Hernández, A. M. (2016). Social media, civic engagement, and the slacktivism hypothesis: lessons from Mexico’s “El Bronco.” Journal of International Affairs, 70(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.2.2012.0001

Jackson, S. J., Bailet, M., & Welles, B. F. (2020). #HashtagActivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice. MIT Press. Cambridge. ISBN 9780262043373

Jones, G. M., Schieffelin, B. B., & Smith, R. E. (2019). When friends who talk together stalk together: Online gossip as metacommunication. In Crispin Thurlow and Kristine Mroczek (Ed). In C. Thurlow & K. Mroczek (Eds.), Digital Discourse: Language in the new media. Oxford Studies in Sociolinguistics. ISBN: 9780199795444

Khan, G. F. (2017). Social Media for Government A Practical Guide to Understanding, Implementing, and Managing Social Media Tools in the Public Sphere. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2942-4

Kompasiana.com. (2021). Aktivisme Tagar dalam Kasus Pemerkosaan 3 Anak di Luwu Timur, Mencari Keadilan Lewat Media Sosial. . Https://Www.Kompasiana.Com/Fery50973/615fafca06310e561e2f5bc2/Mencari-Keadilan-Lewat-Media-Sosial.

Lim, M. (2013). Many Clicks but Little Sticks: Social Media Activism in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(4), 636–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2013.769386

Mayangsari, D., & Salim, M. (2021). The Effectiveness of University Instagram Account as Information Media for Students. 3rd Jogjakarta Communication Conference (JCC 2021). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211121.040

McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. 6th Edition. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1849202923

Nurhajati, L., Wijayanto, X. A., & Fitriyani, L. R. (2022). Twitter as a Public Sphere for COVID-19 Vaccine Discussion. CHANNEL: Jurnal Komunikasi, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.12928/channel.v10i2.160

Pratiwi, A. M. (2021). Initiating Justice for Sexual Violence Victims via Hashtag Activism: Opportunity and Vulnerability In Contemporary Indonesia. Jurnal Perempuan, 26(3), 102–123. https://doi.org/10.34309/jp.v26i3.617

Sandi, A. F., Wibowo, A. A., Nugrahani, R., & Nasir, R. M. (2022). Analysis of Twitter User Responses to the Aqua Billboards Series #DiRumahAJa. CHANNEL: Jurnal Komunikasi, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.12928/channel.v10i1.22332

Sener, G. (2015). Paradigms in Digital Activism. Approaches on New Media Proceedings of 1st International New Media Conference, 61–74. http://guernica.tv

Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation. American Sociological Review 51 (4). 464-481 https://doi.org/10.2307/2095581

van Dijk, J. (2013). The Network Society. In MedieKultur: Journal of media and communication research (Issue 54). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v29i54.7943

Wang, R., & Zhou, A. (2021). Hashtag activism and connective action: A case study of #HongKongPoliceBrutality. Telematics and Informatics, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101600

Yang, G. (2016). Narrative agency in hashtag activism: The case of #blacklivesmatter. Media and Communication, 4(4), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.692

Downloads

Published

2023-04-10

How to Cite

Zuraida, Z. (2023). Comparing the Effectiveness of Hashtags in Digital Social Movements: A Case Study of #PercumaLaporPolisi and #PolriSesuaiProsedur in Indonesia. CHANNEL: Jurnal Komunikasi, 11(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.12928/channel.v11i1.339