Exploring Online-to-Offline Friendships: A Netnographic Study of Interpersonal Communication, Trust, and Privacy in Online Social Networks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/channel.v11i1.310Keywords:
friendship, offline, online, self-disclosure, trustAbstract
Online friendship has become common between generations, especially among Gen Z and Millennials, and some friendships transition from online to offline, which requires disclosing their offline identities. Despite the risks involved, Online Social Networks (OSNs) are essential daily and provide self-expression, social pleasure, and networking opportunities. Privacy is a complex concept with different definitions, and interpersonal communication can be private but can become public depending on the context. Self-disclosure and trust are essential factors in online friendships. This study used netnography to study online consumer-based communities, particularly volleyball fans. We conducted observations, literature reviews, and interviews with informants who had experienced shifting from online friendships to offline ones. We analyzed the data descriptively using the theories of trust and self-disclosure. Participants connect with others who share the same interest in volleyball. They both use pseudonyms to protect their privacy but occasionally post pictures with censorship on their faces due to anxiety over privacy and online crime. They both establish trust with their online friends by analyzing their reputation, performance, mutual friends, interaction, and persona before extending their friendship from online to offline. The study found eight communication patterns that create trust, such as talking about common interests and exchanging personal information, and suggests opportunities for further research on comparing different age and gender groups and exploring communication patterns in other social media platforms.
References
Ahdiat, A. (2022). Ini Aktivitas yang Banyak Dilakukan Orang di Media Sosial. Databoks.
Ahuja, V., & Shakeel, M. (2017). Twitter Presence of Jet Airways-Deriving Customer Insights Using Netnography and Word Clouds. Procedia Computer Science, 122, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.336
Allen, M. (Ed.). (2017). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (1st ed.). SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=4GFCDgAAQBAJ
Ayun, P.Q. (2015). Fenomena Remaja Menggunakan Media Sosial dalam Membentuk Identitas. CHANNEL: Jurnal Komunikasi, 3(2), 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.12928/channel.v3i2.3270
Boyd, D. (2014). It ’ S Complicated the Social Lives of Networked Teens Danah Boyd Contents (Issue December). Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300166439
Brem, A., & Bilgram, V. (2015). The search for innovative partners in co-creation: Identifying lead users in social media through netnography and crowdsourcing. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 37, 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2015.08.004
Brown, C., Czerniewicz, L. & Noakes, T. (2016) Online content creation: looking at students’ social media practices through a Connected Learning lens, Learning, Media and Technology, 41:1, 140-159, DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2015.1107097
Chan, D. K. S., & Cheng, G. H. L. (2004). A comparison of offline and online friendship qualities at different stages of relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504042834
Chan, G. H. (2020). Intimacy, friendship, and forms of online communication among hidden youth in Hong Kong. Computers in Human Behavior, 111(December 2019), 106407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106407
Cocking, D., & Kennett, J. (1998). Friendship and the Self. Ethics, 108(3), 502–527. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381921
Domahidi, E., Festl, R., & Quandt, T. (2014). To dwell among gamers: Investigating the relationship between social online game use and gaming-related friendships. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.023
Gavison, R. (1980). Privacy and the Limits of Law. The Yale Law Journal, 89(3), 421. https://doi.org/10.2307/795891
Grabner-Kräuter, S., & Bitter, S. (2014). Trust in online social networks: A multifaceted perspective. Forum for Social Economics, 44(1), 48–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2013.781517
Hajdu, G., & Sik, E. (2018). Age, Period, and Cohort Differences in Work Centrality and Work Values. Societies, 8(1), 11. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/soc8010011
Hart, J., Ridley, C., Taher, F., Sas, C., & Dix, A. (2008). Exploring the Facebook experience : A new approach to usability. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 358, 471–474. https://doi.org/10.1145/1463160.1463222
Henderson, S., & Gilding, M. (2004). “I’ve never clicked this much with anyone in my life”: Trust and hyperpersonal communication in online friendships. New Media and Society, 6(4), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144804044331
Hidayati, A. N. & Riyanto, E. D. (2020). The Characteristics of Fandom Reveluv as A Cyberfandom of Red Velvet on Twitter. Diglossia. 12 (1). http://journal.unipdu.ac.id:8080/index.php/diglosia/article/view/2240/1229
Jaynes, V. (2020). The social life of screenshots: the power of visibility in teen friendship groups. New Media and Society, 22(8), 1378–1393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819878806
Joinson, A. (1998). Causes and implications of disinhibited behavior on the Internet. In Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications. (pp. 43–60). Academic Press.
Kruse, L. M., Norris, D. R. & Flinchum, J. R. (2018) Social Media as a Public Sphere? Politics on Social Media, The Sociological Quarterly, 59:1, 62-84, DOI: 10.1080/00380253.2017.1383143
Lai, G., & Fung, K. Y. (2020). From online strangers to offline friends: A qualitative study of video game players in Hong Kong. Media, Culture and Society, 42(4), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719853505
Lai, L. S. L., & Turban, E. (2008). Groups formation and operations in the web 2.0 environment and social networks. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(5), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-008-9113-2
Luchtefeld, C., & Jordan, K. D. (2022). Individual differences influencing the relationship between online social support and addictive use of social media. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 8(November), 100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2022.100025
McKercher, B., Lai, B., Yang, L., & Wang, Y. (2020) Travel by Chinese: a generational cohort perspective, Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 25:4, 341-354, DOI: 10.1080/10941665.2019.1709877
Nurhajati, L., Wijayanto, X. A., & Fitriyani, L. R. (2022). Twitter as a Public Sphere for COVID-19 Vaccine Discussion. CHANNEL: Jurnal Komunikasi, 10(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.12928/channel.v10i2.160
Nissenbaum, H. (2011). Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. In Journal of Information Policy (1st Editio, Vol. 1). Stanford Law Books. https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.1.2011.0149
Ohme, J., P. Vanden Abeele, M. M., Van Gaeveren, K., Durnez, W., & De Marez, L. (2020). Staying Informed and Bridging “Social Distance”: Smartphone News Use and Mobile Messaging Behaviors of Flemish Adults during the First Weeks of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Socius. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120950190
Pearce, J. S. (2019). Managing emotion online. Emotion, Space and Society, 33(December 2018), 100618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2019.100618
Petricini, T. (2022). Friendship and Technology; A Philosophical Approach to Computer-Mediated Communication. Routledge. https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results
Rizaty, M. A. (2022). Pengguna Twitter di Indonesia Capai 18,45 Juta pada 2022. Data Indonesia. https://dataindonesia.id/digital/detail/pengguna-twitter-di-indonesia-capai-1845-juta-pada-2022
Salim, M., Rosdian, E.D.S. (2022). Digital Marketing Communication to Increase CRSL Store Brand Awareness. Medium. 9(2). 242-262 https://doi.org/10.25299/medium.2021.vol9(2).8800
Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A Sociological Theory (J. C. Alexander & S. Seidman (Eds.)). Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=ZrwvSrK5I8AC
Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Ramirez, A., Burgoon, J. K., & Peña, J. (2015). Interpersonal and hyperpersonal dimensions of computer-mediated communication. In The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology (Issue January, pp. 1–22). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118426456.ch1
Weir, G. R. S., Toolan, F., & Smeed, D. (2011). The threats of social networking: Old wine in new bottles? Information Security Technical Report, 16(2), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istr.2011.09.008
Westin, A. F. (1968). Privacy And Freedom. Washington and Lee Law Review, 25(1), 166–167. http://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr%5Cnhttp://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol25/iss1/20
Zhang, Y., Tang, L. S. T., & Leung, L. (2011). Gratifications, collective self-esteem, online emotional openness, and traitlike communication apprehension as predictors of Facebook uses. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(12), 733–739. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0042
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 CHANNEL: Jurnal Komunikasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
