The Crisis of Expertise? Digital Religious Authority in Islamic Political Discourse on YouTube

Authors

  • Elita Putri Pradipta Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Firly Annisa Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/channel.v14i1.2032

Keywords:

Digital religious authority, Islamic political discourse, YouTube, Critical Discourse Analysis, Mediatization

Abstract

This study examines the transformation of religious authority in digital media through Islamic political discourse on YouTube, focusing on the content produced by Guru Gembul. Employing Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis, this research analyzes selected YouTube videos published between December 2024 and April 2025, using video transcripts and visual elements as primary data. The study investigates how religious authority is discursively constructed in the absence of formal religious or academic credentials. The findings reveal that authority is produced through casual language, emotional appeals, and trend-responsive narratives that prioritize audience engagement over epistemic depth. Rather than presenting systematic theological arguments, book references function as symbolic markers of intellectual credibility. It indicates a shift in how expertise is evaluated in digital religious spaces, where visibility, affectivity, and resonance with audiences become central sources of authority. This study contributes to scholarship on digital religion and media discourse by demonstrating how religious authority is reconfigured through platform-mediated discursive practices, extending Critical Discourse Analysis beyond traditional institutional contexts. In practice, the findings highlight the importance of digital literacy for critically assessing religious authority in online environments.

References

Abidin, C. (2018). Internet celebrity: Understanding fame online. Emerald Publishing Limited.

Annisa, F. (2022). Contesting piety: representations of Indonesian internet celebrities on Instagram. (Doctoral dissertation). Keele University. https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/423506

Annisa, F., Nurnisya, F. Y., Raqib, M., Mohd, B., & Pradipt, E. P. (2025). Decoding Diversity : Indonesian Students’ Reception of Religious and Multicultural Themes in ‘ Mentega Terbang ’ Using Stuart Hall’s Encoding / Decoding Framework. 13(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.12928/channel.v13i1.1341

APJII. (2020). Laporan Survei Internet APJII 2019 – 2020. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia, 2020, 1–146. https://apjii.or.id/survei

Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329

Barthes, R. (1977). Image-music-text, trans. Stephen Heath (New York: Hill and Wang, 1977), 146.

Beta, A. R. (2019). Commerce, piety, and politics: Indonesian young Muslim women’s groups as religious influencers. New Media and Society, 21(10), 2140–2159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819838774

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. Greenwood Pres.

Carstensen, M. B. (2011). Paradigm man vs. the bricoleur: Bricolage as an alternative vision of agency in ideational change. European Political Science Review, 3(1), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773910000342

Fadhli, A., Fahzaria, N. A., Indrawati, I. N., Dewi, I. N. I., & Ridzki, M. Z. (2025). Dialogic Engagement and Institutional Trust: A Netnographic Study of@ halal. Indonesia on Instagram as a Government Communication Platform. CHANNEL: Jurnal Komunikasi, 13(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.12928/channel.v13i1.956

Fairclough, N. (2013a). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2013b). Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 9–20). Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2023). Technologization of discourse. In Texts and Practices Revisited (pp. 27–42). Routledge.

Febrian, H. (2024). Visualizing Authority: Rise of the Religious Influencers on Instagram. Social Media and Society, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241286850

Gbadegeshin, S. A. (2019). Bricolage: Theoretical and contemporary uses of the concept in entrepreneurship studies. Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 14(1), 101–139. https://asiaentrepreneurshipjournal.com/index.php/jaes/issue/view/41/38

Goffman, E. (2023). The presentation of self in everyday life. In Social theory re-wired (pp. 450–459). Routledge.

Gramsci, A. (2021). Hegemony. In Power and inequality (pp. 38–39). Routledge.

Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage Publications

Hamdani, A. R. (2021). Digital Fatwa: Kontestasi dan Fragmentasi Otoritas Keagamaan di Media Sosial. In Pharmacognosy Magazine (Vol. 75, Issue 17).

Haugaard, M. (2018). What is authority? Journal of Classical Sociology, 18(2), 104-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X17723737

Hearn, Alison. (2008). `Meat, Mask, Burden`: Probing the contours of the branded `self`. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540508090086

Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of religion: A theory of the media as agents of religious change. Northern Lights: Film & Media Studies Yearbook, 6(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1386/nl.6.1.9_1

Hjarvard, S. (2011). The mediatization of religion: Theorizing religion, media and social change. Culture and Religion, 12(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2011.579719

Hjarvard, S. (2015). Mediatization and the changing authority of religion. Media, Culture and Society, 38(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715615412

Isbah, L. P., & Faisal, A. (2023). Mengapa Pancasila mirip dengan komunisme? Perspektif Guru Gembul. Journal of Information Systems and Management, 2(6), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.4444/jisma.v2i6.776

Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1993). Economies of Signs and Space. SAGE Publications.

Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188

Lövheim, M., & Hjarvard, S. (2019). The Mediatized Conditions of Contemporary Religion: Critical Status and Future Directions. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture, 8(2), 206–225. https://doi.org/10.1163/21659214-00802002

Lubis, N. S., & Nasution, M. I. P. (2023). Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Dampaknya Pada Masyarakat. KOHESI: Jurnal Multidisplin Saintek, 1(12), 41–50. https://ejournal.warunayama.org/index.php/kohesi/article/view/1311

Lünenborg, M., & Maier, T. (2019). Analyzing affective media practices through the use of video analysis. In Analyzing Affective Societies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429424366-8

Marwick, A., & Boyd, D. (2011). To See and Be Seen: Celebrity Practice on Twitter. Convergence, 17(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856510394539

Marwick, A. E., & Partin, W. C. (2024). Constructing alternative facts: Populist expertise and the QAnon conspiracy. New Media and Society, 26(5), 2535–2555. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221090201

Meisner, C., & Ledbetter, A. M. (2022). Participatory branding on social media: The affordances of live streaming for creative labor. New Media and Society, 24(5), 1179–1195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820972392

Mesalina, J., Zahara, A. E., Kusnadi, E., & Rafii, M. (2024). Reproduksi Otoritas Keagamaan Di Pesantren Daaru Attauhid Muaro Kumpeh: Pendidikan Berbasis Tauhid Dan Respon Masyarakat. El Buhuth: Borneo Journal of Islamic Studies, 317-330. https://doi.org/10.21093/el-buhuth.v7i2.8194

Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x

Nichols, T. (2021). The Death of Expetise (5th ed.). Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.

Rachmad, Y. E. (2023). Social Media Impact Theory.

Rahmawati, A. (2021). Manufacturing Authenticity: The Rise of Indonesian Micro-Celebrities on Instagram. Jurnal The Messenger, 13(1), 108. https://doi.org/10.26623/themessenger.v13i1.999

Sholikhin, A., Machmud, S. A., & Mukhlis, C. A. (2024). Analisis channel YouTube Guru Gembul dalam kesantunan berbahasa. RUNGKAT: RUANG KATA, 1(2), 25-32. https://e-jurnal.unisda.ac.id/index.php/rungkat/article/view/7157

Thomas, K., Kelley, P. G., Consolvo, S., Samermit, P., & Bursztein, E. (2022). “It’s common and a part of being a content creator”: Understanding How Creators Experience and Cope with Hate and Harassment Online. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501879

Tsuria, R., & Campbell, H. A. (2021). Introduction to the study of digital religion. In Digital religion. Routledge.

van Bruinessen, M. (2013). Introduction: Contemporary Developments in Indonesian Islam and the “Conservative Turn” of the Early Twenty-first Century. In Contemporary Developments in Indonesian Islam: Explaining the "Conservative Turn"(pp. 1-20). Singapore: ISEAS Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814414579-005

Van Dijk, T. A. (2017). Discourse and power. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Zeng, J., & Abidin, C. (2021). ‘#OkBoomer, time to meet the Zoomers’: studying the memefication of intergenerational politics on TikTok. Information Communication and Society, 24(16), 2459–2481. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1961007

Downloads

Published

2026-04-15

How to Cite

Pradipta, E. P., & Annisa, F. (2026). The Crisis of Expertise? Digital Religious Authority in Islamic Political Discourse on YouTube. CHANNEL: Jurnal Komunikasi, 14(1), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.12928/channel.v14i1.2032