Analysis of the multirepresentation ability of physics education students in problem-solving related to physics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/jrkpf.v12i1.1185Keywords:
Multirepresentation, Mathematical representation, Ability analiysis, Visual representation, Problem solvingAbstract
Students frequently struggle to comprehend and solve challenges during learning, especially when dealing with physics-related problems. This study examines how well physics education students can perform multiple representations when solving physics-related problems. This survey was conducted on 48 samples selected using purposive sampling techniques and data collection methods using questionnaires. The data collection instrument in this study used a Likert scale questionnaire packaged in Google Forms. The data that had been collected through the questionnaire was then analyzed descriptively. The findings of this study indicate that the multirepresentation skills possessed by physics students can improve their understanding and help them solve physics problems that they face both textually and contextually. Multirepresentation abilities are also in line with encouraging strengthening the curriculum and teaching methods of students in physics education study programs to be more meaningful and comprehensive. Students who have studied physics materials will be able to illustrate the material in figures, tables, or mathematical equations. For students and lecturers to engage in meaningful and comprehensive learning in the future, the findings of this study will serve as the foundation for improving the quality of instruction in the physics education study program.
References
[1] L. Avraamidou, “Identities in/out of physics and the politics of recognition,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 58-94, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21721
[2] F. Lafifa, D. Rosana, S. Suyanta, S. Nurohman, and S. R. D. Astuti, “Integrated STEM approach to improving 21st-century skills in Indonesia: A systematic review,” International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 252-267, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v3i2.219
[3] H. K. Mohajan, “Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects,” Journal of Economic Development, Environment, and People, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 23-48, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v7i1.571
[4] E. Manz, R. Lehrer, and L. Schauble, “Rethinking the classroom science investigation,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 1148-1174, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21625
[5] P. Y. A. Dewi and K. H. Primayana, “Effect of learning module with setting contextual teaching and learning to increase the understanding of concepts,” International Journal of Education and Learning, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19-26, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v1i1.26
[6] S. Fathonah, E. Cahyono, S. Haryani, S. Sarwi, and N. H. Lestari, “Application of Multirepresentation-based creative problem-solving learning models to improve students' critical and creative thinking skills,” International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering, and Education, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 185-200, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2024-12-1-185-200
[7] D. Adelia, R. Linda, and M. Erna, “Development of e-module based on multiple representations to improve the competence of chemical literacy and learning independence of students on the material reaction rate,” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 11101-11110, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.5541
[8] M. L. Tomkelski, M. Baptista, and A. Richit, “Physics teachers' learning on using multiple representations in lesson study about Ohm's law,” European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 427-444, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12906
[9] B. Mainali, “Representation in teaching and learning mathematics,” International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-21, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1111
[10] P. G. W. Adnyana, I. M. Suarsana, and I. G. P. Suharta, “Multirepresentation discourse model and math problem-solving skills of high school students,” Journal of Learning Improvement and Lesson Study, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 40-48, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.24036/jlils.v1i1.8
[11] N. Munfaridah, L. Avraamidou, and M. Goedhart, “The use of multiple representations in undergraduate physics education: what do we know and where do we go from here?” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1934-1943, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9577
[12] C. Sa'dijah and M. Muksar, “Assessing students' errors in mathematical translation: From symbolic to verbal and graphic representations,” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 115-125, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20819
[13] Z. E. Ünal, A. M. Ala, G. Kartal, S. Özel, and D. C. Geary, “Visual and symbolic representations as components of algebraic reasoning,” Journal of Numerical Cognition, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 327-345, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.11151
[14] V. Hatisaru, “Exploring evidence of mathematical tasks and representations in the drawings of middle school students,” International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 609-617, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8482
[15] C. Zhang, Z. Yang, X. He, and L. Deng, “Multimodal intelligence: Representation learning, information fusion, and applications,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 478-493, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2020.2987728
[16] F. Musil, A. Grisafi, A. P. Bartók, C. Ortner, G. Csányi, and M. Ceriotti, “Physics-inspired structural representations for molecules and materials,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 121, no. 16, pp. 9759-9815, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00021
[17] L. Sahara, N. Nafarudin, S. Fayanto, and B. A. Tairjanovna, “Analysis of improving students' physics conceptual understanding through discovery learning models supported by Multirepresentation: Measurement topic,” Indonesian Review of Physics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 57-65, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.12928/irip.v3i2.3064
[18] D. S. Pambudi, I. K. Budayasa, and A. Lukito, “The role of mathematical connections in mathematical problem solving,” Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 129-144, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.14.2.10985.129-144
[19] R. Çakır, Ö. Korkmaz, Ö. İdil, and F. U. Erdoğmuş, “The effect of robotic coding education on preschoolers' problem solving and creative thinking skills,” Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1008-1016, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100812
[20] P. G. W. Adnyana, I. M. Suarsana, and I. G. P. Suharta, “Multirepresentation discourse model and math problem-solving skills of high school students,” Journal of Learning Improvement and Lesson Study, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 40-48, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.24036/jlils.v1i1.8
[21] A. A. Nugroho, N. Nizaruddin, I. Dwijayanti, and A. Tristianti, “Exploring students' creative thinking in the use of representations in solving mathematical problems based on cognitive style,” Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 202-217, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v5i2.9983
[22] T. Sunarti, “Research analysis on Multirepresentation in physical materials in the year 2014 to 2021,” IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 259-268, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v3i3.218
[23] C. Coman, L. G. Țîru, L. Meseșan-Schmitz, C. Stanciu, and M. C. Bularca, “Online teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: Students' perspective,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 24, pp. 10367-10378, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410367
[24] P. P. Ray, “ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations, and future scope,” Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 121-154, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003
[25] C. F. J. Pols, P. J. J. M. Dekkers, and m. J. De Vries, “What do they know? Investigating students' ability to analyze experimental data in secondary physics education,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 274-297, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1865588
[26] S. Dawadi, S. Shrestha, and R. A. Giri, “Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms,” Journal of Practical Studies in Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 25-36, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20
[27] A. Håkansson and V. Henzel, “Who chooses to enroll in a new national gambling self-exclusion system? A general population survey in Sweden,” Harm Reduction Journal, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-020-00423-x
[28] S. R. Manurung, “improving students thinking ability in physics using interactive multimedia based problem solving,” Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 460-470, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i2.28205
[29] C. Buckley and C. Nerantzi, “Effective use of visual representation in research and teaching within higher education,” International Journal of Management and Applied Research, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 196-214, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.18646/2056.73.20-014
[30] E. Krisnaningsih and E. Hariyono, “Implementation of Multirepresentation learning on climate change integrated dynamic fluid to improve student's problem-solving skills,” Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 44-56, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v10i1.12465
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Umu Salumita, Himawan Putranta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
