Supervising Success: Strategies for Supporting Fast-track Postgraduate Students in Indonesia

Authors

  • Hari Setyowibowo Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
  • Nisrina Nur Izzah Psychological Intervention Research Working Group, Centre for Psychological Innovation and Research, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
  • Juniarti Duwi Lestari Directorate of Resources for Higher Education, Directorate General of Higher Education, Research, and Technology, Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology, Indonesia
  • Asep Khoerudin Directorate of Resources for Higher Education, Directorate General of Higher Education, Re
  • Harinaldi Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Nuri Andar Wulan Department of Food Science and Technology, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26555/humanitas.v21i2.929

Keywords:

Fast-track programme, Postgraduate students, Self-determination theory, Supervisor’s support

Abstract

Students in fast-track postgraduate programmes face unique challenges, including intense academic pressure, role management difficulties, and high expectations for research output. This study, using the Self-Determination Theory (SDT) framework, specifically investigated good practices of supervisory strategies to improve postgraduate student well-being and academic performance in such accelerated programs. We collected data through online Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with 264 supervisors from various academic fields and then analysed the data using thematic analysis. We incorporated expert review, FGDs facilitator guidance, and rigorous data validation processes to ensure trustworthiness. The findings reveal several critical challenges students face, including academic, self-management, relationship, financial, and program-related difficulties, highlighting areas where enhanced supervisory support is crucial. Furthermore, we found that supervisors assist students by providing essential academic information, offering structured guidance, and fostering a supportive environment. These findings can guide improved supervision strategies in a postgraduate fast-track programme.

References

Almasri, N., Read, B., & Vandeweerdt, C. (2022). Mental health and the PHD: Insights and implications for political science. PS: Political Science & Politics, 55(2), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521001396

Barry, K. M., Woods, M., Warnecke, E., Stirling, C., & Martin, A. (2018). Psychological health of doctoral candidates, study-related challenges and perceived performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(3), 468–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1425979

Bireda, A. D. (2015). Challenges to the doctoral journey: a case of female doctoral students from Ethiopia. Open Praxis, 7(4), 287. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.7.4.243

Blanchard, C., & Haccoun, R. R. (2020). Investigating the impact of advisor support on the perceptions of graduate students. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(8), 1010–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1632825

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. QMiP Bulletin, 1(33). https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsqmip.2022.1.33.46

Carter, S. M., Shih, P., Williams, J., Degeling, C., & Mooney-Somers, J. (2021). Conducting qualitative research online: Challenges and solutions. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 14(6), 711–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00528-w

Castelló, M., Pardo, M., Sala-Bubaré, A., & Suñe-Soler, N. (2017). Why do students consider dropping out of doctoral degrees? Institutional and personal factors. Higher Education, 74(6), 1053–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0106-9

Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019

Cornwall, J., Mayland, E. C., van der Meer, J., Spronken-Smith, R. A., Tustin, C., & Blyth, P. (2019). Stressors in early-stage doctoral students. Studies in Continuing Education, 41(3), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1534821

Devos, C., Van der Linden, N., Boudrenghien, G., Azzi, A., Frenay, M., Galand, B., & Klein, O. (2015). Doctoral supervision in the light of the three types of support promoted in self-determination theory. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 439–464. https://doi.org/10.28945/2308

Ekpoh, U. I. (2016). Postgraduate studies: The challenges of research and thesis writing. Journal of Educational and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2016.v6n3p67

Gong, Y. (Frank), Gao, X. (Andy), Li, M., & Lai, C. (2021). Cultural adaptation challenges and strategies during study abroad: New Zealand students in China. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(4), 417–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1856129

Greene, M. (2015). Come hell or high water: Doctoral students’ perceptions on support services and persistence. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 501–518. https://doi.org/10.28945/2327

Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M., & de Lacey, S. (2016). Qualitative research methods: When to use them and how to judge them. Human Reproduction, 31(3), 498–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev334

Hassan, A., Jamaludin, N. S., Sulaiman, T., & BAKI, R. (2010). Western and Eastern educational philosophies. Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia Conference Presentation, 25.

Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014

Hospel, V., & Galand, B. (2016). Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students’ engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learning and Instruction, 41, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.001

Le Roux, I. (2018). Coaching as support for postgraduate students: A case study. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 16. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v16i0.939

Litalien, D., & Guay, F. (2015). Dropout intentions in PhD studies: A comprehensive model based on interpersonal relationships and motivational resources. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.004

Ministry of Education, C. R. and T. (n.d.). Tentang. https://www.pmdsu.id/tentang/

Olivier, E., Galand, B., Morin, A. J. S., & Hospel, V. (2021). Need-supportive teaching and student engagement in the classroom: Comparing the additive, synergistic, and global contributions. Learning and Instruction, 71, 101389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101389

O.Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860

Rai, N., & Thapa, B. (2019). A study on purposive sampling method in research. Kathmandu: Kathmandu School of Law.

Rigler, K. L., Bowlin, L. L. K., Sweat, K., Watts, S., & Throne, R. (2017). Agency, socialization, and support: A critical review of doctoral student attrition. 3rd International Conference on Doctoral Education.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2022). Self-Determination Theory. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 1–7). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_2630-2

Shafie, A. A. H. B., Othman, K., Baharudin, D. F., Mokhtar, A. N., Rahimi, M. K. A., Jaladin, R. A. M., Amat, S., Yasin, N. M., Wahab, S., & Kamal, N. F. M. (2022). A review on online focus group discussion during the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 13.

Sim, J., & Waterfield, J. (2019). Focus group methodology: some ethical challenges. Quality & Quantity, 53(6), 3003–3022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00914-5

Sverdlik, A., C. Hall, N., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018). The PhD experience: A review of the factors influencing doctoral students’ completion, achievement, and well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 361–388. https://doi.org/10.28945/4113

Utari, V. Y. D. (2023). Gender identity and unpaid carework: an ethnography of the lives of female Indonesian PhD students and their families in Australia [Doctoral Thesis, The University of Western Australia]. https://doi.org/10.26182/yasg-d615

Wollast, R., Aelenei, C., Chevalère, J., Van der Linden, N., Galand, B., Azzi, A., Frenay, M., & Klein, O. (2023). Facing the dropout crisis among PhD candidates: the role of supervisor support in emotional well-being and intended doctoral persistence among men and women. Studies in Higher Education, 48(6), 813–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2172151

Woodyatt, C. R., Finneran, C. A., & Stephenson, R. (2016). In-person versus online focus group discussions. Qualitative Health Research, 26(6), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316631510

Downloads

Published

2024-08-30

How to Cite

Hari Setyowibowo, Nur Izzah, N., Juniarti Duwi Lestari, Asep Khoerudin, Harinaldi, & Nuri Andar Wulan. (2024). Supervising Success: Strategies for Supporting Fast-track Postgraduate Students in Indonesia. Humanitas: Indonesian Psychological Journal, 21(2), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.26555/humanitas.v21i2.929

Issue

Volume 21 (2) 2024

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Hari Setyowibowo, Nisrina Nur Izzah, Juniarti Duwi Lestari, Asep Khoerudin, Harinaldi, Nuri Andar Wulan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.