The Effect of Portfolio-based Assessment and Language Processing on Acquiring Second Language

Authors

  • Slamet Setiawan Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Imroatul Karimah Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Ahmad Munir Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26555/adjes.v9i2.91

Keywords:

alternative assessments, portfolio assessments, language process, SLA, simple present tense

Abstract

Only little research has explored how information from alternative assessments especially portfolios might be best utilized in developing second language acquisition processes of a single individual student’s comprehension of simple present tense as one of grammar aspects. To understand these ideas more complete, a greater initial has to be set on a study. In addition, there must be a more prominent center on how teachers can implement alternative assessment especially portfolio assessment and how the information from these assessments can be utilized to inform and direct the learning process. Using mix method design, this study examined the language processing of two students (i.e., a high-ability learner and a low-ability learner) studying at grade seventh at MTsN 4 surabaya. According to the findings, There was difference in the degree to which the high ability student accurately noticed the answers of the questions (the use of s/es in simple present tense), rather than the low ability student. Both low ability and high ability learners could recognize the learning gaps before and after the learning process, and they notice their development system towards the target language. However, the high ability student performed better.

References

Birgin, O., & Baki, A. (2007). The use of portfolio to assess student ’ s performance. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 75–90.

Daskalogiannaki, E. (2012). Language testing and assessment issues in the Greek educational system: Developing and assessing EFL students’ writing skills via a class blog. Rpltl, 3(1), 269–292.

Demirel, M., & Duman, H. (2015). The use of portfolio in English language teaching and its effects on achievement and attitude. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2634–2640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.598

Dewaele, J. (2017). Individual differences in second language acquisition. In the new handbook of second language acquisition (Issue September 2009, pp. 623–646).

Efendi, Z. (2017). Improving students’ ability in writing English teaching by using portfolio assessment. Getsempena English Education Journal (GEEJ), 4(2), 152–163.

Goctu, R. (2012). Portfolio assessment in English language teaching ( ELT ). Journal of Education, 1(1), 23–27.

Huang, J. (2012). The implementation of portfolio assessment in integrated English course. English Language and Literature Studies, 2(4), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v2n4p15

Ivanova, O. V. (2017). The use of e-portfolio to develop English language learners’ autonomy and independence. Information Technologies and Learning Tools JOurnal, 60(4), 18–21.

Keyvanfar, A., Madhi, M., Tahami, S., & Reza, G. (2019). Improving grammar and writing skills of Iranian EFL learners through portfolio assessment. Studies in Literature and Language, 18(3), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.3968/11110

Ma’arif, A. S., Abdullah, F., Fatimah, A. S., & Hidayati, A. N. (2021). Portfolio-based assessment in English language learning: Highlighting the students’ perceptions. J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic, 8(1), 1–11.

Melograno, V.J. (2000) Designing a portfolio system for K-12 physical education: A step-by-step process. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 4(2), 97-115. DOI: 10.1207/S15327841Mpee0402_5

Monib, W. K., Karimi, A. Q., & Nijat, N. (2020). Effects of alternative assessment in EFL classroom: A systematic review. American International Journal of Education and Linguistics Research, 3(2), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.46545/aijelr.v3i2.152

Ok, S. (2014). Reflections of ELT students on their progress in language and vocabulary use in portfolio process. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 7(2), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n2p53

Perrone, M. (2011). The effect of classroom-based assessment and language processing on the second language acquisition of EFL students. Journal of Adult Education, 40(1), 20–33. http://ezproxy.deakin.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ960966&site=ehost-live&scope=site

PETRE, A.-L. (2017). The Impact of alternative assessment strategies on students. Scientific Research and Education in the Air Force, 19(2), 157–160. https://doi.org/10.19062/2247-3173.2017.19.2.22

Phongsirikul, M. (2018). Traditional and alternative assessments in ELT: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions. REFLections, 25(1), 61–84. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/reflections/article/view/136267

Saville-Troike, M. (2012). Introducing second language acquisition. In Introducing Second Language Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511808838.002

Sulistyo, T., Eltris, K. P. N., Mafulah, S., Budianto, S., Saiful, S., & Heriyawati, D. F. (2020). Portfolio assessment: Learning outcomes and students’ attitudes. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.15169

Yulastri, D., Aulia, D., & Saptopramono, H. (2018). The use of edmodo to improve the writing ability of English department students of State Polytechnic of Padang. Journal Polingua: Scientific Journal of Linguistic Literatura and Education, 5(2), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.30630/polingua.v5i2.40

Zafar, S. (2012). Individual learner differences and second language acquisition : A review. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(4), 639–646. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.4.639-646

Downloads

Published

2022-10-04

Issue

Section

Articles