Bridging the gap: A multi-level narrative review of leadership styles and knowledge hiding in organizations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/jombi.v4i1.2200Abstract
Purpose-This narrative review examines how ten leadership styles, transformational, transactional, servant, ethical, abusive, altruistic, empowering, exploitative, humble, and self-serving shape employee knowledge hiding behavior in organizations, along with the mediating and moderating mechanisms that condition this relationship.
Methodology-Through a thematic analysis of 26 empirical and conceptual articles indexed in Scopus and Web of Science, this study identifies two parallel pathways of influence. It synthesizes the conceptual mechanisms underlying each leadership–knowledge hiding relationship.
Findings-A supportive-relational leadership style reduces knowledge hiding through psychological ownership, prosocial motivation, meaningful work, and positive affect. In contrast, a destructive leadership style increases knowledge hiding through perceived competition, employee silence, and emotional exhaustion. Notably, empowering leadership occupies an ambiguous, paradoxical position: it reduces knowledge hiding when employees possess adequate psychological resources, but exacerbates it under high hindrance stressors and high workload, depending on employees' resource conditions.
Research Limitations-As a narrative review, this study did not systematically assess the methodological quality of individual articles. Most of the reviewed studies rely on cross-sectional designs, which limit causal inference, and the literature is dominated by East Asian and Western contexts, raising questions about the generalizability of the proposed framework to other cultural settings, such as Southeast Asia.
Novelty-Building on social learning theory, social exchange theory, and conservation of resources theory, this study proposes a multi-level, multi-path conceptual framework. It demonstrates that the same mediating construct can produce opposing effects depending on the leadership context in which it operates, a finding that advances understanding beyond the single-style, single-mediator model.
References
Abubakar, A. M., Behravesh, E., Rezapouraghdam, H., & Yildiz, S. B. (2019). Applying an artificial intelligence technique to predict knowledge hiding behavior. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.011
Al Hawamdeh, N. (2023). Does humble leadership mitigate employees’ knowledge-hiding behavior? The mediating role of employees’ self-efficacy and trust in their leader. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(6), 1702–1719. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-05-2022-0353
Ali, M., Usman, M., Khan, M. A. S., Shafique, I., & Mughal, F. (2024). Articulating cognizance about what to hide and what not: Insights into why and when ethical leadership regulates employee knowledge-hiding behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 190(4), 885–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05426-9
Anand, A., Offergelt, F., & Anand, P. (2022). Knowledge hiding: A systematic review and research agenda. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(6), 1438–1457. https://doi.org//10.1108/jkm-04-2021-0336
Anser, M. K., Ali, M., Usman, M., Rana, M. L. T., & Yousaf, Y. (2020). Ethical leadership and knowledge hiding: An intervening and interactional analysis. The Service Industries Journal, 41(11–12), 839–860. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2020.1739657
Auliyah, N., Fikri, M. A., & Wardana, M. G. W. (2025). Trust and innovative work behavior: The role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Management: Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), 18(1), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.35508/jom.v18i1.18847
Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2001). Developing potential across a full range of leadership: Cases on transactional and transformational leadership. Psychology Press.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.
Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(90)90061-S
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Černe, M., Nerstad, C. G. L., Dysvik, A., & Škerlavaj, M. (2014). What goes around comes around: Knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0122
Chen, Y., Luo, H., Chen, J., & Guo, Y. (2022). Building data-driven dynamic capabilities to arrest knowledge hiding: A knowledge management perspective. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1138–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.050
Connelly, C. E., Zweig, D., Webster, J., & Trougakos, J. P. (2012). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(1), 64–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.737
Connelly, C. E., Černe, M., Dysvik, A., & Škerlavaj, M. (2019). Understanding knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(7), 779–782. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2406
Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. Sage Publications.
Fan, F., & Sukpasjaroen, K. (2024). Knowledge hiding behavior in online learning communities: A chain mediation based on self-efficacy and organizational psychological ownership. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(7), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.7.20
Farling, M. L., Stone, A. G., & Winston, B. E. (1999). Servant leadership: Setting the stage for empirical research. Journal of Leadership Studies, 6(1–2), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179199900600104
Feng, Y., Ayub, A., Fatima, T., Irfan, S., & Sarmad, M. (2022). I can’t be creative due to my exploitative leader! A moderated mediation interplay of leader-member exchange quality and knowledge hiding. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35(3), 558–579. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-04-2021-0127
Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329
Guo, L., Cheng, K., & Luo, J. (2020). The effect of exploitative leadership on knowledge hiding: A conservation of resources perspective. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-03-2020-0085
He, Y., & Wei, X. (2022). Preventing knowledge hiding behaviors through workplace friendship and altruistic leadership, and the mediating role of positive emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.905890
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
Islam, T., Asif, A., Jamil, S., & Ali, H. F. (2024). How abusive supervision affects knowledge hiding? The mediating role of employee silence and moderating role of psychological ownership. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 54(4), 804–822. https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-01-2022-0021
Jahanzeb, S., Fatima, T., Bouckenooghe, D., & Bashir, F. (2019). The knowledge hiding link: A moderated mediation model of how abusive supervision affects employee creativity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(6), 810-819. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1659245
Khan, M. M., Mubarik, M. H., Ahmed, S. S., & Islam, T. (2025). Service inhibited knowledge hiding: Exploring how and when servant leadership inhibits knowledge hiding. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 74(1/2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-12-2022-0279
Konczak, L. J., Stelly, D. J., & Trusty, M. L. (2000). Defining and measuring empowering leader behaviors: Development of an upward feedback instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(2), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970420.
Ladan, S., Nordin, N. B., & Belal, H. M. (2017). Does knowledge-based psychological ownership matter? Transformational leadership and knowledge hiding: A proposed framework. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 11(4), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.24052/jbrmr/v11is04/dkbpomtlakhapf
Ma, H., Tang, S., & Zhao, C. (2022). CEOs’ leadership behaviors and new venture team stability: The effects of knowledge hiding and team collectivism. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1001277
McCleskey, J. A. (2014). Situational, transformational, and transactional leadership and leadership development. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 5(4), 117–130.
Men, C. H., Fong, P. S. W., Huo, W. W., Zhong, J., Jia, R. Q., & Luo, J. L. (2018). Ethical leadership and knowledge hiding: A moderated mediation model of psychological safety and mastery climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(3), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4027-7
Moin, M. F., Omar, M. K., Ali, A., Rasheed, M. I., & Abdel-Motaleb, M. (2022). A moderated mediation model of knowledge hiding. The Service Industries Journal, 44(5–6), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2022.2112180
Nguyen, T. M., Malik, A., & Budhwar, P. (2022). Knowledge hiding in organizational crisis: The moderating role of leadership. Journal of Business Research, 139, 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.026
Owens, B. P., & Hekman, D. R. (2012). Modeling how to grow: An inductive examination of humble leader behaviors, contingencies, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 787–818. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0441
Pereira, V., & Mohiya, M. (2021). Share or hide? Investigating positive and negative employee intentions and organizational support in the context of knowledge sharing and hiding. Journal of Business Research, 129, 368–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.051
Rezwan, R. B., & Takahashi, Y. (2021). The psychology behind knowledge hiding in an organization. Administrative Sciences, 11(2), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020057
Rost, J. (1993). Leadership for the 21st century. Praeger.
Salas-Vallina, A., & Alegre, J. (2018). Unselfish leaders? Understanding the role of altruistic leadership and organizational learning on happiness at work. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(5), 633–649. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-11-2017-0345
Scuotto, V., Nespoli, C., Tran, P. T., & Cappiello, G. (2021). An alternative way to predict knowledge hiding: The lens of transformational leadership. Journal of Business Research, 140, 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.045
Siachou, E., Trichina, E., Papasolomou, I., & Sakka, G. (2021). Why do employees hide their knowledge and what are the consequences? A systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research, 135, 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.026
Syed, F., Naseer, S., Akhtar, M. W., Husnain, M., & Kashif, M. (2021). Frogs in boiling water: A moderated-mediation model of exploitative leadership, fear of negative evaluation and knowledge hiding behaviors. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(8), 2067–2087. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2019-0611
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556375
Wang, L., Jia, Y., & Xie, K. (2024). The impact of challenge and hindrance stressors on knowledge hiding: The mediating role of job crafting and work withdrawal. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1465480
Wang, Z., Xing, L., Xu, H., & Hannah, S. T. (2021). Not all followers are the same: Effects of followers’ dark triad personality on knowledge hiding. Journal of Business Ethics, 174(3), 745–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04353-y
Wang, Y., Han, M. S., Xiang, D., & Hampson, D. P. (2018). The double-edged effects of perceived knowledge hiding: Empirical evidence from the sales context. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(2), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-04-2018-0245
Xiao, M., & Cooke, F. L. (2019). Why and when knowledge hiding in the workplace is harmful: A review of the literature and directions for future research in the Chinese context. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 57(4), 470–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12198
Zahoor, K., Hameed, I., John, A., & Qadeer, F. (2024). How transactional leadership impacts tacit and explicit knowledge hiding: The role of perceived competition and leader knowledge hiding. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.47263/jasem.8(1)03
Zhang, X., Yao, Z., Wu, Q., & Tsai, F. S. (2022). Every coin has two sides: The impact of time pressure on employees’ knowledge hiding. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(8), 2084–2106. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-02-2021-0149
Zhang, Y., Duan, C., Zhang, J., & Akhtar, M. N. (2025a). To enlighten or to obscure: A meta-analytic inquiry into the effects of leadership behavior on employees’ knowledge hiding. Current Psychology, 44, 12479–12490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-08036-y
Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., Zhang, J., Wang, J., & Akhtar, M. N. (2025b). Self-serving leadership and employee knowledge hiding: A dual-pathway model. Management Decision, 63(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/md-05-2023-0831
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Management and Business Insight
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
